{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
Skip Navigation
www.ahrq.gov
search
home
whatsnew
collection
primers
glossary
newsletter
mypsnet
newsletter
The Collection
>
Hospitals
PATIENT SAFETY PRIMERS
Narrow By
clear selections
Safety Target
•
Device-related Complications (112)
•
Diagnostic Errors (72)
•
Identification Errors (54)
•
Discontinuities, Gaps, and Hand-Off Problems (261)
•
Fatigue and Sleep Deprivation (43)
•
Medication Safety (856)
•
Medical Complications (288)
•
Nonsurgical Procedural Complications (45)
•
Surgical Complications (236)
•
Transfusion Complications (14)
•
Psychological and Social Complications (54)
Origin/Sponsor
•
Africa (4)
•
Asia (58)
•
Australia and New Zealand (88)
•
Central and South America (11)
•
Europe (510)
•
North America (1482)
Resource Types
•
Audiovisual (14)
•
Award (7)
•
Book/Report (95)
•
Clinical Guideline (2)
•
Journal Article (1787)
•
Legislation/Regulation (21)
•
Meeting/Conference (2)
•
Newspaper/Magazine Article (174)
•
Press Release/Announcement (7)
•
Special or Theme Issue (14)
•
Tools/Toolkit (22)
•
Web Resource (25)
•
Grant (2)
Error Types
•
Epidemiology of Errors and Adverse Events (1003)
•
Active Errors (338)
•
Latent Errors (142)
•
Near Miss (47)
Approach to Improving Safety
•
Quality Improvement Strategies (497)
•
Legal and Policy Approaches (136)
•
Error Reporting and Analysis (766)
•
Communication Improvement (424)
•
Human Factors Engineering (296)
•
Teamwork (118)
•
Specialization of Care (188)
•
Logistical Approaches (162)
•
Culture of Safety (245)
•
Technologic Approaches (543)
•
Education and Training (331)
Clinical Areas
•
Allied Health Services (4)
•
Dentistry (1)
•
Medicine (1597)
•
Nursing (228)
•
Pharmacy (387)
Target Audience
•
Health Care Providers (1397)
•
Health Care Executives and Administrators (1862)
•
Non-Health Care Professionals (859)
•
Patients (92)
Setting of Care
< All
Hospitals
•
General Hospitals (615)
•
Children’s Hospitals (70)
•
Specialty Hospitals (47)
1 - 20
of 2172
Show Excerpt
Don't Show Excerpt
Sort by relevance
Sort by significance
Sort by title
Sort by date
Sort by author
dropdown
STUDY
The impact of a closed-loop electronic prescribing and administration system on prescribing errors, administration errors and staff time: a before-and-after study.
Franklin BD, O'Grady K, Donyai P, Jacklin A, Barber N. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007;16:279-284.
STUDY
Pharmacists' interventions in prescribing errors at hospital discharge: an observational study in the context of an electronic prescribing system in a UK teaching hospital.
Abdel-Qader DH, Harper L, Cantrill JA, Tully MP. Drug Saf. 2010;33:1027-1044.
STUDY
Can an electronic prescribing system detect doctors who are more likely to make a serious prescribing error?
Coleman JJ, Hemming K, Nightingale PG, et al. J R Soc Med. 2011;104:208-218.
STUDY
Impact of health information technology on detection of potential adverse drug events at the ordering stage.
Roberts LL, Ward MM, Brokel JM, Wakefield DS, Crandall DK, Conlon P. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2010;67:1838-1846.
STUDY
Medication-error reporting and pharmacy resident experience during implementation of computerized prescriber order entry.
Weant KA, Cook AM, Armitstead JA. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007;64:526-530.
REVIEW
Prescribing errors in hospital practice.
Tully MP. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;74:668-675.
STUDY
High incidence of medication documentation errors in a Swiss university hospital due to the handwritten prescription process.
Hartel MJ, Staub LP, Röder C, Eggli S. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:199.
STUDY
Indication-based prescribing prevents wrong-patient medication errors in computerized provider order entry (CPOE).
Galanter W, Falck S, Burns M, Laragh M, Lambert BL. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20:477-481.
BOOK/REPORT
An In Depth Investigation into Causes of Prescribing Errors by Foundation Trainees in Relation to Their Medical Education—EQUIP Study.
Dornan T, Ashcroft D, Heathfield H, et al. London: General Medical Council; 2009.
STUDY
Does the implementation of an electronic prescribing system create unintended medication errors? A study of the sociotechnical context through the analysis of reported medication incidents.
Redwood S, Rajakumar A, Hodson J, Coleman JJ. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011;11:29.
REVIEW
Systematic review of medication safety assessment methods.
Meyer-Massetti C, Cheng CM, Schwappach DL, et al. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2011;68:227-240.
STUDY
Patient-specific electronic decision support reduces prescription of excessive doses.
Seidling HM, Schmitt SPW, Bruckner T, et al. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:e15.
STUDY
Paediatric dosing errors before and after electronic prescribing.
Jani YH, Barber N, Wong ICK. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:337-340.
STUDY
Mixed results in the safety performance of computerized physician order entry.
Metzger J, Welebob E, Bates DW, Lipsitz S, Classen DC. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29:655-663.
STUDY
Preventable and non-preventable adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: a prospective chart review in the Netherlands.
Dequito AB, Mol PG, van Doormaal JE, et al. Drug Saf. 2011;34:1089-1100.
COMMENTARY
Implementation of a telepharmacy service to provide round-the-clock medication order review by pharmacists.
Wakefield DS, Ward MM, Loes JL, O'Brien J, Sperry L. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2010;67:2052-2057.
NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE ARTICLE
Dose of technology helps Shands at UF avoid drug errors.
Chun D. Gainsville Sun. August 21, 2006.
STUDY
Understanding and preventing wrong-patient electronic orders: a randomized controlled trial.
Adelman JS, Kalkut GE, Schechter CB, et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20:305-310.
STUDY
Drug–drug interactions that should be non-interruptive in order to reduce alert fatigue in electronic health records.
Phansalkar S, van der Sijs H, Tucker AD, et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20:489-493.
STUDY
Errors and electronic prescribing: a controlled laboratory study to examine task complexity and interruption effects.
Magrabi F, Li SY, Day RO, Coiera E. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010;17:575-583.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Next >