{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
Skip Navigation
www.ahrq.gov
search
home
whatsnew
collection
primers
glossary
newsletter
mypsnet
newsletter
The Collection
>
General Hospitals
PATIENT SAFETY PRIMERS
Narrow By
clear selections
Safety Target
•
Device-related Complications (60)
•
Diagnostic Errors (23)
•
Identification Errors (58)
•
Discontinuities, Gaps, and Hand-Off Problems (140)
•
Fatigue and Sleep Deprivation (25)
•
Medication Safety (309)
•
Medical Complications (128)
•
Nonsurgical Procedural Complications (38)
•
Surgical Complications (266)
•
Transfusion Complications (3)
•
Psychological and Social Complications (37)
Origin/Sponsor
•
Asia (15)
•
Australia and New Zealand (24)
•
Central and South America (3)
•
Europe (93)
•
North America (867)
Resource Types
•
Audiovisual (5)
•
Award (3)
•
Book/Report (11)
•
Clinical Guideline (3)
•
Journal Article (888)
•
Legislation/Regulation (11)
•
Meeting/Conference (1)
•
Newspaper/Magazine Article (70)
•
Press Release/Announcement (1)
•
Special or Theme Issue (9)
•
Tools/Toolkit (5)
•
Web Resource (11)
Error Types
•
Epidemiology of Errors and Adverse Events (302)
•
Active Errors (210)
•
Latent Errors (49)
•
Near Miss (25)
Approach to Improving Safety
•
Quality Improvement Strategies (254)
•
Legal and Policy Approaches (51)
•
Error Reporting and Analysis (248)
•
Communication Improvement (269)
•
Human Factors Engineering (180)
•
Teamwork (141)
•
Specialization of Care (82)
•
Logistical Approaches (99)
•
Culture of Safety (137)
•
Technologic Approaches (212)
•
Education and Training (225)
Clinical Areas
•
Allied Health Services (1)
•
Medicine (866)
•
Nursing (193)
•
Pharmacy (76)
Target Audience
•
Health Care Providers (770)
•
Health Care Executives and Administrators (925)
•
Non-Health Care Professionals (361)
•
Patients (46)
Setting of Care
< All
General Hospitals
•
Intensive Care Units (184)
•
Emergency Departments (108)
•
Operating Room (276)
•
Labor and Delivery (54)
1 - 20
of 1018
Show Excerpt
Don't Show Excerpt
Sort by relevance
Sort by significance
Sort by title
Sort by date
Sort by author
dropdown
STUDY
Bar code medication administration technology: characterization of high-alert medication triggers and clinician workarounds.
Miller DF, Fortier CR, Garrison KL. Ann Pharmacother. 2011;45:162-168.
NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE ARTICLE
Scanning out medication errors: Ohio Valley Hospital's automated IV system provides real-time access to patient data.
Carbasho T. Pittsburgh Business Times. April 25, 2005.
STUDY
Medication Administration Time Study (MATS): nursing staff performance of medication administration.
Elganzouri ES, Standish CA, Androwich I. J Nurs Adm. 2009;39:204-210.
STUDY
Effect of bar-code technology on the safety of medication administration.
Poon EG, Keohane CA, Yoon CS, et al. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1698-1707.
STUDY
Clinical scenarios: enhancing the skill set of the nurse as a vigilant guardian.
Jacobson T, Belcher E, Sarr B, Riutta E, Ferrier JD, Botten MA. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2010;41:347-353.
STUDY
Why patient summaries in electronic health records do not provide the cognitive support necessary for nurses' handoffs on medical and surgical units: insights from interviews and observations.
Staggers N, Clark L, Blaz JW, Kapsandoy S. Health Informatics J. 2011;17:209-223.
STUDY
An examination of technical efficiency, quality, and patient safety in acute care nursing units.
Mark B, Jones C, Lindley L, Ozcan Y. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2009;10:180-186.
STUDY
Prevalence of medication administration errors in two medical units with automated prescription and dispensing.
Rodriguez-Gonzalez CG, Herranz-Alonso A, Martin-Barbero ML, et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19:72-78.
STUDY
The content and context of change of shift report on medical and surgical units.
Staggers N, Jennings BM. J Nurs Adm. 2009;39:393-398.
STUDY
Hospital RNs' experiences with disruptive behavior: a qualitative study.
Walrath JM, Dang D, Nyberg D. J Nurs Care Qual. 2010;25:105-116.
STUDY
Association of interruptions with an increased risk and severity of medication administration errors.
Westbrook JI, Woods A, Rob MI, Dunsmuir WTM, Day RO. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:683-690.
COMMENTARY
Communication in the perioperative setting.
Cvetic E. AORN J. 2011;94:261-270.
STUDY
Learning mechanisms to limit medication administration errors.
Drach-Zahavy A, Pud D. J Adv Nurs. 2010;66:794-805.
COMMENTARY
Condition concern: an innovative response system for enhancing hospitalized patient care and safety.
Baird SK, Turbin LB. J Nurs Care Qual. 2011;26:199-207.
COMMENTARY
Medication room madness: calming the chaos.
Conrad C, Fields W, McNamara T, Cone M. J Nurs Care Qual. 2009;25:137-144.
STUDY
Comparing errors in ED computer-assisted vs conventional pediatric drug dosing and administration.
Yamamoto L, Kanemori J. Am J Emerg Med. 2010;28:588-592.
STUDY
Adherence to a medication safety protocol: current practice for labeling medications and solutions on the sterile field.
Brown-Brumfield D, DeLeon A. AORN J. 2010;91:610-617.
STUDY
The impact of type of manual medication cart filling method on the frequency of medication administration errors: a prospective before and after study.
Schimmel AM, Becker ML, van den Bout T, Taxis K, van den Bemt PM. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011;48:791-797.
COMMENTARY
Identified safety risks with splitting and crushing oral medications.
Paparella S. J Emerg Nurs. 2010;36:156-158.
STUDY
Using snowball sampling method with nurses to understand medication administration errors.
Sheu SJ, Wei IL, Chen CH, Yu S, Tang FI. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18:559-569.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Next >