{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
Skip Navigation
www.ahrq.gov
search
home
whatsnew
collection
primers
glossary
newsletter
mypsnet
newsletter
The Collection
>
Clinical Technologists
PATIENT SAFETY PRIMERS
Narrow By
clear selections
Safety Target
•
Device-related Complications (9)
•
Diagnostic Errors (17)
•
Identification Errors (6)
•
Discontinuities, Gaps, and Hand-Off Problems (17)
•
Medication Safety (7)
•
Medical Complications (3)
•
Nonsurgical Procedural Complications (10)
•
Surgical Complications (3)
Origin/Sponsor
•
Asia (1)
•
Australia and New Zealand (2)
•
Europe (3)
•
North America (54)
Resource Types
•
Book/Report (1)
•
Clinical Guideline (1)
•
Journal Article (48)
•
Legislation/Regulation (3)
•
Newspaper/Magazine Article (8)
•
Press Release/Announcement (1)
•
Tools/Toolkit (1)
Error Types
•
Epidemiology of Errors and Adverse Events (22)
•
Active Errors (10)
•
Latent Errors (6)
•
Near Miss (1)
Approach to Improving Safety
•
Quality Improvement Strategies (22)
•
Legal and Policy Approaches (2)
•
Error Reporting and Analysis (28)
•
Communication Improvement (7)
•
Human Factors Engineering (9)
•
Specialization of Care (3)
•
Logistical Approaches (19)
•
Culture of Safety (7)
•
Technologic Approaches (4)
•
Education and Training (8)
Clinical Areas
•
Medicine (57)
•
Nursing (2)
Target Audience
< All
Clinical Technologists
Setting of Care
•
Hospitals (26)
•
Patient Transport (5)
1 - 20
of 63
Show Excerpt
Don't Show Excerpt
Sort by relevance
Sort by significance
Sort by title
Sort by date
Sort by author
dropdown
COMMENTARY
Putting power into patient safety: interventions.
Astion M. Laboratory Errors & Patient Safety. May-June 2005;1:5-8.
STUDY
Patient safety in the clinical laboratory: a longitudinal analysis of specimen identification errors.
Wagar EA, Tamashiro L, Yasin B, Hilborne L, Bruckner DA. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006;130:1662-1668.
COMMENTARY
Putting power into patient safety interventions. Part two: 99% is not good enough.
Astion M. Laboratory Errors & Patient Safety. July-August 2005;2:1-4.
STUDY
Medical errors arising from outsourcing laboratory and radiology services.
Chasin BS, Elliott SP, Klotz SA. Am J Med. 2007;120:819.e9-11.
STUDY
Computer-assisted bar-coding system significantly reduces clinical laboratory specimen identification errors in a pediatric oncology hospital.
Hayden RT, Patterson DJ, Jay DW, et al. J Pediatr. 2008;152:219-224.
REVIEW
Identifying cross contaminants and specimen mix-ups in surgical pathology.
Hunt JL. Adv Anat Pathol. 2008;15:211-217.
STUDY
Patient safety concerns arising from test results that return after hospital discharge.
Roy CL, Poon EG, Karson AS, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:121-128.
REVIEW
Patient safety and error reduction in surgical pathology.
Nakhleh RE. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008;132:181-185.
REVIEW
Point-of-care testing, medical error, and patient safety: a 2007 assessment.
Ehrmeyer SS, Laessig RH. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45:766-773.
STUDY
Finding blunders in thyroid testing: experience in newborns.
Zilka LJ, Lott JA, Baker LC, Linard SM. J Clin Lab Anal. 2008;22:254-256.
STUDY
Correlation of workload with disagreement and amendment rates in surgical pathology and nongynecologic cytology.
Renshaw AA, Gould EW. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006;125:820-822.
COMMENTARY
Right Patient, Wrong Sample
Astion M. AHRQ WebM&M [serial online]. December 2006.
STUDY
CT for suspected appendicitis in children: an analysis of diagnostic errors.
Taylor GA, Callahan MJ, Rodriguez D, Smink DS. Pediatr Radiol. 2006;36:331-337.
STUDY
Classifying laboratory incident reports to identify problems that jeopardize patient safety.
Astion ML, Shojania KG, Hamill TR, Kim S, Ng VL. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;120:18-26.
STUDY
Frequent diagnostic errors in cardiac PET/CT due to misregistration of CT attenuation and emission PET images: a definitive analysis of causes, consequences, and corrections.
Gould KL, Pan T, Loghin C, Johnson NP, Guha A, Sdringola S. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1112-1121.
STUDY
Medical emergency team calls in the radiology department: patient characteristics and outcomes.
Ott LK, Pinsky MR, Hoffman LA, et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Mar 2; [Epup ahead of print].
STUDY
Studying critical values: adverse event identification following a critical laboratory values study at the Ohio State University Medical Center.
Jenkins JJ, Mac Crawford J, Bissell MG. Am J Clin Pathol. 2007;128:604-609.
REVIEW
Radiologic errors and malpractice: a blurry distinction.
Berlin L. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:517-522.
STUDY
Medical error identification, disclosure, and reporting: do emergency medicine provider groups differ?
Hobgood C, Weiner B, Tamayo-Sarver JH. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13:443-451.
STUDY
Comparison and interpretation of urinalysis performed by a nephrologist versus a hospital-based clinical laboratory.
Tsai JJ, Yeun JY, Kumar VA, Don BR. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005;46:820-829.
1
2
3
4
Next >