{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
Skip Navigation
www.ahrq.gov
search
home
whatsnew
collection
primers
glossary
newsletter
mypsnet
newsletter
The Collection
>
Information Professionals
PATIENT SAFETY PRIMERS
Narrow By
clear selections
Safety Target
•
Device-related Complications (15)
•
Diagnostic Errors (19)
•
Identification Errors (18)
•
Discontinuities, Gaps, and Hand-Off Problems (63)
•
Medication Safety (326)
•
Medical Complications (25)
•
Nonsurgical Procedural Complications (2)
•
Surgical Complications (17)
•
Transfusion Complications (3)
•
Psychological and Social Complications (7)
Origin/Sponsor
•
Asia (12)
•
Australia and New Zealand (19)
•
Europe (88)
•
North America (454)
Resource Types
•
Audiovisual (1)
•
Award (1)
•
Book/Report (16)
•
Journal Article (490)
•
Legislation/Regulation (7)
•
Meeting/Conference (4)
•
Newspaper/Magazine Article (49)
•
Special or Theme Issue (5)
•
Tools/Toolkit (4)
•
Web Resource (7)
•
Grant (2)
Error Types
•
Epidemiology of Errors and Adverse Events (165)
•
Active Errors (96)
•
Latent Errors (42)
•
Near Miss (8)
Approach to Improving Safety
•
Quality Improvement Strategies (92)
•
Legal and Policy Approaches (32)
•
Error Reporting and Analysis (102)
•
Communication Improvement (78)
•
Human Factors Engineering (72)
•
Teamwork (20)
•
Specialization of Care (20)
•
Logistical Approaches (34)
•
Culture of Safety (23)
•
Technologic Approaches (530)
•
Education and Training (39)
Clinical Areas
•
Allied Health Services (2)
•
Medicine (330)
•
Nursing (29)
•
Pharmacy (131)
Target Audience
< All
Information Professionals
Setting of Care
•
Hospitals (307)
•
Residential Facilities (7)
•
Ambulatory Care (75)
•
Outpatient Surgery (3)
1 - 20
of 586
Show Excerpt
Don't Show Excerpt
Sort by relevance
Sort by significance
Sort by title
Sort by date
Sort by author
dropdown
COMMENTARY
In Conversation with…Eric G. Poon, MD, MPH
AHRQ WebM&M [serial online]. September 2008.
STUDY
Comparison of methods for identifying patients at risk of medication-related harm.
van Doormaal JE, Rommers MK, Kosterink JGW, Teepe-Twiss IM, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM, Mol PGM. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:e26.
STUDY
Medication reconciliation during internal hospital transfer and impact of computerized prescriber order entry.
Lee JY, Leblanc K, Fernandes OA, et al. Ann Pharmacother. 2010;44:1887-1895.
STUDY
An unintended consequence of electronic prescriptions: prevalence and impact of internal discrepancies.
Palchuk MB, Fang EA, Cygielnik JM, et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010;17:472-476.
STUDY
Effect of computerized provider order entry with clinical decision support on adverse drug events in the long-term care setting.
Gurwitz JH, Field TS, Rochon P, et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56:2225-2233.
STUDY
A systematic review to evaluate the accuracy of electronic adverse drug event detection.
Forster AJ, Jennings A, Chow C, Leeder C, van Walraven C. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19:31-38.
REVIEW
Year in review: medication mishaps in the elderly.
Peron EP, Marcum ZA, Boyce R, Hanlon JT, Handler SM. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2011;9:1-10.
STUDY
Critical drug–drug interactions for use in electronic health records systems with computerized physician order entry: review of leading approaches.
Classen DC, Phansalkar S, Bates DW. J Patient Saf. 2011;7:61-65.
STUDY
Mixed results in the safety performance of computerized physician order entry.
Metzger J, Welebob E, Bates DW, Lipsitz S, Classen DC. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29:655-663.
STUDY
Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.
Hunt DL, Haynes RB, Hanna SE, Smith K. JAMA. 1998;280:1339-1346.
STUDY
Effect of an electronic medication reconciliation application and process redesign on potential adverse drug events: a cluster-randomized trial.
Schnipper JL, Hamann C, Ndumele CD, et al. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:771-780.
STUDY
National study on the frequency, types, causes, and consequences of voluntarily reported emergency department medication errors.
Pham JC, Story JL, Hicks RW, et al. J Emerg Med. 2011;40:485-492.
STUDY
Computerized decision support for medication dosing in renal insufficiency: a randomized, controlled trial.
Terrell KM, Perkins AJ, Hui SL, Callahan CM, Dexter PR, Miller DK. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;56:623-629.
STUDY
Impact of health information technology on detection of potential adverse drug events at the ordering stage.
Roberts LL, Ward MM, Brokel JM, Wakefield DS, Crandall DK, Conlon P. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2010;67:1838-1846.
STUDY
Intravenous infusion safety technology: return on investment.
Danello SH, Maddox RR, Schaack GJ. Hosp Pharm. 2009;44:680-687, 696.
STUDY
An empirical model to estimate the potential impact of medication safety alerts on patient safety, health care utilization, and cost in ambulatory care.
Weingart SN, Simchowitz B, Padolsky H, et al. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169;1465-1473.
REVIEW
The efficacy of computer-enabled discharge communication interventions: a systematic review.
Motamedi SM, Posadas-Calleja J, Straus S, et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20:403-415.
COMMENTARY
Development of the Leapfrog methodology for evaluating hospital implemented inpatient computerized physician order entry systems.
Kilbridge PM, Welebob EM, Classen DC. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:81-84.
STUDY
The impact of computerized provider order entry on medication errors in a multispecialty group practice.
Devine EB, Hansen RN, Wilson-Norton JL, et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010;17:78-84.
COMMENTARY
A Mid-Summer Fog
Braddock CH. AHRQ WebM&M [serial online]. November 2008.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Next >