{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
Skip Navigation
www.ahrq.gov
search
home
whatsnew
collection
primers
glossary
newsletter
mypsnet
newsletter
The Collection
>
Safety Scientists
PATIENT SAFETY PRIMERS
Narrow By
clear selections
Safety Target
•
Device-related Complications (31)
•
Diagnostic Errors (14)
•
Identification Errors (4)
•
Discontinuities, Gaps, and Hand-Off Problems (27)
•
Fatigue and Sleep Deprivation (3)
•
Medication Safety (73)
•
Medical Complications (37)
•
Nonsurgical Procedural Complications (4)
•
Surgical Complications (18)
•
Transfusion Complications (2)
•
Psychological and Social Complications (9)
Origin/Sponsor
•
Australia and New Zealand (11)
•
Europe (75)
•
North America (258)
Resource Types
•
Audiovisual (2)
•
Book/Report (20)
•
Journal Article (265)
•
Legislation/Regulation (4)
•
Meeting/Conference (8)
•
Newspaper/Magazine Article (20)
•
Press Release/Announcement (3)
•
Special or Theme Issue (10)
•
Tools/Toolkit (2)
•
Web Resource (6)
•
Grant (8)
Error Types
•
Epidemiology of Errors and Adverse Events (61)
•
Active Errors (30)
•
Latent Errors (25)
•
Near Miss (5)
Approach to Improving Safety
•
Quality Improvement Strategies (87)
•
Legal and Policy Approaches (45)
•
Error Reporting and Analysis (131)
•
Communication Improvement (44)
•
Human Factors Engineering (103)
•
Teamwork (26)
•
Specialization of Care (6)
•
Logistical Approaches (17)
•
Culture of Safety (58)
•
Technologic Approaches (66)
•
Education and Training (40)
Clinical Areas
•
Allied Health Services (1)
•
Medicine (196)
•
Nursing (13)
•
Pharmacy (12)
Target Audience
< All
Safety Scientists
Setting of Care
•
Hospitals (169)
•
Psychiatric Facilities (2)
•
Residential Facilities (5)
•
Ambulatory Care (36)
•
Outpatient Surgery (2)
•
Patient Transport (3)
1 - 20
of 348
Show Excerpt
Don't Show Excerpt
Sort by relevance
Sort by significance
Sort by title
Sort by date
Sort by author
dropdown
STUDY
Multi-professional patterns and methods of communication during patient handoffs.
Benham-Hutchins MM, Effken JA. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79:252-267.
STUDY
Cognitive performance-altering effects of electronic medical records: an application of the human factors paradigm for patient safety.
Holden RJ. Cogn Tech Work. 2011;13:11-29.
COMMENTARY
Smart pumps: advanced capabilities and continuous quality improvement.
Vanderveen T. Patient Saf Quality Healthc. January/February 2007.
REVIEW
The impact of computerized provider order entry systems on inpatient clinical workflow: a literature review.
Niazkhani Z, Pirnejad H, Berg M, Aarts J. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16:539-549.
STUDY
Using Lean to improve medication administration safety: in search of the "perfect dose."
Ching JM, Long C, Williams BL, Blackmore CC. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013;39:195-204.
STUDY
Paper- and computer-based workarounds to electronic health record use at three benchmark institutions.
Flanagan ME, Saleem JJ, Millitello LG, Russ AL, Doebbeling BN. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Mar 14; [Epub ahead of print].
COMMENTARY
Patient safety answers require outreach, in-reach, and partnerships.
Burt HA. J Hosp Librariansh. 2011;11:366-378.
COMMENTARY
Utilizing information technology to mitigate the handoff risks caused by resident work hour restrictions.
Bernstein J, MacCourt DC, Jacob DM, Mehta S. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2627-2732.
STUDY
Relationship between medication event rates and the Leapfrog computerized physician order entry evaluation tool.
Leung AA, Keohane C, Lipsitz S, et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Apr 18; [Epub ahead of print].
STUDY
Predictive combinations of monitor alarms preceding in-hospital code blue events.
Hu X, Sapo M, Nenov V, et al. J Biomed Inform. 2012;45:913-921.
STUDY
Problems and solutions arising during a study in visual semantics of the medical emergency team system.
Santiano N, Baramy LS, Young L, et al. Qual Health Res. 2008 ct: 18: 1336-44.
COMMENTARY
A new frontier in patient safety.
McCannon J, Berwick DM. JAMA
.
2011;305:2221-2222.
COMMENTARY
The Henry Ford Health System No Harm Campaign: a comprehensive model to reduce harm and save lives.
Conway WA, Hawkins S, Jordan J, Voutt-Goos MJ. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012;38:318-327.
COMMENTARY
A framework for patient safety: a defense nuclear industry-based high-reliability model.
Birnbach DJ, Rosen LF, Williams L, Fitzpatrick M, Lubarsky DA, Menna JD. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013;39:233-240.
COMMENTARY
Duty hour reform in a shifting medical landscape.
Jena AB, Prasad V. J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Apr 9; [Epub ahead of print].
REVIEW
What is patient safety culture? A review of the literature.
Sammer CE, Lykens K, Singh KP, Mains DA, Lackan NA. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2010;42:156-165.
STUDY
Frequency of and risk factors for preventable medication-related hospital admissions in the Netherlands.
Leendertse AJ, Egberts ACG, Stoker LJ, van den Bemt PMLA, for the HARM Study Group. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:1890-1896.
STUDY
Improving patient safety using the sterile cockpit principle during medication administration: a collaborative, unit-based project.
Fore AM, Sculli GL, Albee D, Neily J. J Nurs Manag. 2013;21:106-111.
STUDY
Failure mode and effects analysis outputs: are they valid?
Shebl NA, Franklin BD, Barber N. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:150.
STUDY
Validating the Patient Safety Indicators in the Veterans Health Administration: do they accurately identify true safety events?
Rosen AK, Itani KM, Cevasco M, et al. Med Care. 2012;50:74-85.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Next >