AHRQ Patient Safety Network

The Collection > Computerized Adverse Event Detection

Narrow By

clear selections

Safety Target

•Device-related Complications (5)

•Diagnostic Errors (9)

•Identification Errors (1)

•Discontinuities, Gaps, and Hand-Off Problems (13)

•Fatigue and Sleep Deprivation (1)

•Medication Safety (110)

•Medical Complications (21)

•Nonsurgical Procedural Complications (2)

•Surgical Complications (12)

•Transfusion Complications (1)

•Psychological and Social Complications (1)

Origin/Sponsor

•Asia (1)

•Australia and New Zealand (5)

•Europe (18)

•North America (125)

Resource Types

•Book/Report (1)

•Journal Article (124)

•Legislation/Regulation (1)

•Meeting/Conference (1)

•Newspaper/Magazine Article (26)

•Press Release/Announcement (1)

•Special or Theme Issue (1)

•Tools/Toolkit (1)

Error Types

•Epidemiology of Errors and Adverse Events (47)

•Active Errors (36)

•Latent Errors (14)

Approach to Improving Safety
< All

Computerized Adverse Event Detection

Clinical Areas

•Medicine (111)

•Nursing (8)

•Pharmacy (48)

Target Audience

•Health Care Providers (98)

•Health Care Executives and Administrators (116)

•Non-Health Care Professionals (98)

•Patients (6)

Setting of Care

•Hospitals (98)

•Residential Facilities (2)

•Ambulatory Care (22)

•Outpatient Surgery (3)

1 - 20 of 156

Show ExcerptDon't Show Excerpt

dropdown

STUDY

Electronic health record-based surveillance of diagnostic errors in primary care.

Singh H, Giardina TD, Forjuoh SN, et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;22:93-100.

STUDY

Using an electronic prescribing system to ensure accurate medication lists in a large multidisciplinary medical group.

Stock R, Scott J, Gurtel S. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009;35:271-279.

STUDY

Assessing the value of electronic prescribing in ambulatory care: A focus group study.

Weingart SN, Massagli M, Cyrulik A, et al. Int J Med Inform. 2009;78:571-578.

STUDY

Alternatives to potentially inappropriate medications for use in e-prescribing software: triggers and treatment algorithms.

Hume AL, Quilliam BJ, Goldman R, Eaton C, Lapane KL. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20:875-884.

STUDY

Preventing potentially inappropriate medication use in hospitalized older patients with a computerized provider order entry warning system.

Mattison MLP, Afonso KA, Ngo LH, Mukamal KJ. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:1331-1336.

NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE ARTICLE

Rx for medication errors.

Friedley NJ. Med Econ. October 17, 2008;85:34-38.

STUDY

Identifying causes of adverse events detected by an automated trigger tool through in-depth analysis.

Muething SE, Conway PH, Kloppenborg E, et al. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:435-439.

NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE ARTICLE

Medication errors occurring with the use of bar-code administration technology.

PA-PSRS Patient Saf Advis. December 2008;5:122-126.

STUDY

Impact of non-interruptive medication laboratory monitoring alerts in ambulatory care.

Lo HG, Matheny ME, Seger DL, Bates DW, Gandhi TK. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16:66-71.

STUDY

The incidence and cost of unexpected hospital use after scheduled outpatient endoscopy.

Leffler DA, Kheraj R, Garud S, et al. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:1752-1757.

STUDY

Characteristics of medication errors and adverse drug events in hospitals participating in the California Pediatric Patient Safety Initiative.

Takata GS, Taketomo CK, Waite S; for the California Pediatric Patient Safety Initiative. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008;65:2036-2044.

NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE ARTICLE

Supplementary Advisory: Results of the PA-PSRS Workgroup on Pharmacy Computer System Safety.

PA-PSRS Patient Saf Advis. May 2007;4(suppl 2):1-8.

NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE ARTICLE

Electronic prescribing vulnerabilities: height and weight mix-up leads to dosing error.

ISMP Medication Safety Alert! Acute Care Edition. August 26, 2010;15:1-3.

STUDY

A mixed method study of the merits of e-prescribing drug alerts in primary care.

Lapane KL, Waring ME, Schneider KL, Dubé C, Quilliam BJ. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:442-446.

STUDY

Sustaining and spreading the reduction of adverse drug events in a multicenter collaborative.

Tham E, Calmes HM, Poppy A, et al. Pediatrics. 2011;128:e438-e445.

STUDY

Critical drug–drug interactions for use in electronic health records systems with computerized physician order entry: review of leading approaches.

Classen DC, Phansalkar S, Bates DW. J Patient Saf. 2011;7:61-65.

STUDY

Prescribers' interactions with medication alerts at the point of prescribing: a multi-method, in situ investigation of the human–computer interaction.

Russ AL, Zillich AJ, McManus MS, Doebbeling BN, Saleem JJ. Int J Med Inform. 2012;81:232-243.

STUDY

Impact of health information technology on detection of potential adverse drug events at the ordering stage.

Roberts LL, Ward MM, Brokel JM, Wakefield DS, Crandall DK, Conlon P. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2010;67:1838-1846.

STUDY

Experience with a trigger tool for identifying adverse drug events among older adults in ambulatory primary care.

Singh R, McLean-Plunckett EA, Kee R, et al. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:199-204.

STUDY

Signal and noise: applying a laboratory trigger tool to identify adverse drug events among primary care patients.

Brenner S, Detz A, López A, Horton C, Sarkar U. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21:670-675.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next >