AHRQ Patient Safety Network

The Collection > Computerized Adverse Event Detection

Narrow By

clear selections

Safety Target

•Device-related Complications (5)

•Diagnostic Errors (9)

•Identification Errors (1)

•Discontinuities, Gaps, and Hand-Off Problems (13)

•Fatigue and Sleep Deprivation (1)

•Medication Safety (110)

•Medical Complications (22)

•Nonsurgical Procedural Complications (2)

•Surgical Complications (12)

•Transfusion Complications (1)

•Psychological and Social Complications (1)

Origin/Sponsor

•Asia (1)

•Australia and New Zealand (5)

•Europe (18)

•North America (126)

Resource Types

•Book/Report (1)

•Journal Article (125)

•Legislation/Regulation (1)

•Meeting/Conference (1)

•Newspaper/Magazine Article (26)

•Press Release/Announcement (1)

•Special or Theme Issue (1)

•Tools/Toolkit (1)

Error Types

•Epidemiology of Errors and Adverse Events (47)

•Active Errors (37)

•Latent Errors (14)

Approach to Improving Safety
< All

Computerized Adverse Event Detection

Clinical Areas

•Medicine (112)

•Nursing (8)

•Pharmacy (47)

Target Audience

•Health Care Providers (98)

•Health Care Executives and Administrators (117)

•Non-Health Care Professionals (98)

•Patients (6)

Setting of Care

•Hospitals (98)

•Residential Facilities (2)

•Ambulatory Care (23)

•Outpatient Surgery (3)

1 - 20 of 157

Show ExcerptDon't Show Excerpt

dropdown

NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE ARTICLE

Medication errors occurring with the use of bar-code administration technology.

PA-PSRS Patient Saf Advis. December 2008;5:122-126.

STUDY

Characteristics of medication errors and adverse drug events in hospitals participating in the California Pediatric Patient Safety Initiative.

Takata GS, Taketomo CK, Waite S; for the California Pediatric Patient Safety Initiative. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008;65:2036-2044.

STUDY

From research to practice: factors affecting implementation of prospective targeted injury-detection systems.

Sorensen AV, Harrison MI, Kane HL, Roussel AE, Halpern MT, Bernard SL. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20:527-533.

NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE ARTICLE

Supplementary Advisory: Results of the PA-PSRS Workgroup on Pharmacy Computer System Safety.

PA-PSRS Patient Saf Advis. May 2007;4(suppl 2):1-8.

STUDY

Comparison of computerized surveillance and manual chart review for adverse events.

Tinoco A, Evans RS, Staes CJ, Lloyd JF, Rothschild JM, Haug PJ. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18:491-497.

STUDY

Predictive value of alert triggers for identification of developing adverse drug events.

Moore C, Li J, Hung CC, Downs J, Nebeker JR. J Patient Saf. 2009;5:223-228.

STUDY

Medication-error alerts for warfarin orders detected by a bar-code-assisted medication administration system.

Fitzhenry F, Doran J, Lobo B, et al. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2011;68:434-441.

COMMENTARY

A model for medication safety event detection.

Snyder RA, Fields W. Int J Qual Health Care. 2010;22:179-186.

NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE ARTICLE

As industry automates, adverse events continue to haunt caregivers.

Wetzel TG. Health Data Manage. 2011 Feb;19:86, 88, 90 passim.

STUDY

Adverse drug event rates in six community hospitals and the potential impact of computerized physician order entry for prevention.

Hug BL, Witkowski DJ, Sox CM, et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25:31-38.

STUDY

Reevaluating the safety profile of pediatrics: a comparison of computerized adverse drug event surveillance and voluntary reporting in the pediatric environment.

Ferranti J, Horvath MM, Cozart H, Whitehurst J, Eckstrand J. Pediatrics. 2008;121:e1201-e1207.

STUDY

Identifying causes of adverse events detected by an automated trigger tool through in-depth analysis.

Muething SE, Conway PH, Kloppenborg E, et al. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:435-439.

STUDY

Impact of health information technology on detection of potential adverse drug events at the ordering stage.

Roberts LL, Ward MM, Brokel JM, Wakefield DS, Crandall DK, Conlon P. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2010;67:1838-1846.

NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE ARTICLE

Common cause analysis.

Clapper C, Crea K. Patient Saf Qual Healthc. May/June 2010;7:30-35.

STUDY

Clinical and safety impact of an inpatient pharmacist-directed anticoagulation service.

Schillig J, Kaatz S, Hudson M, Krol GD, Szandzik EG, Kalus JS. J Hosp Med. 2011;6:322-328.

STUDY

A trigger tool fails to identify serious errors and adverse events in pediatric otolaryngology.

Lander L, Roberson DW, Plummer KM, Forbes PW, Healy GB, Shah RK. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;143:480-486.

COMMENTARY

Eliminating adverse drug events at Ascension Health.

Butler K, Mollo P, Gale JL, Rapp DA. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007;33:527-536.

STUDY

Can surveillance systems identify and avert adverse drug events? A prospective evaluation of a commercial application.

Jha AK, Laguette J, Seger A, Bates DW. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15:647-653.

STUDY

Critical drug–drug interactions for use in electronic health records systems with computerized physician order entry: review of leading approaches.

Classen DC, Phansalkar S, Bates DW. J Patient Saf. 2011;7:61-65.

STUDY

A multifaceted approach to safety: the synergistic detection of adverse drug events in adult inpatients.

Ferranti J, Horvath MM, Cozart H, et al. J Patient Saf. 2008;4:184-190.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next >