{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
Skip Navigation
www.ahrq.gov
search
home
whatsnew
collection
primers
glossary
newsletter
mypsnet
newsletter
The Collection
>
Computerized Adverse Event Detection
PATIENT SAFETY PRIMERS
Narrow By
clear selections
Safety Target
•
Device-related Complications (5)
•
Diagnostic Errors (9)
•
Identification Errors (1)
•
Discontinuities, Gaps, and Hand-Off Problems (13)
•
Fatigue and Sleep Deprivation (1)
•
Medication Safety (110)
•
Medical Complications (21)
•
Nonsurgical Procedural Complications (2)
•
Surgical Complications (11)
•
Transfusion Complications (1)
•
Psychological and Social Complications (1)
Origin/Sponsor
•
Asia (1)
•
Australia and New Zealand (5)
•
Europe (18)
•
North America (124)
Resource Types
•
Journal Article (124)
•
Legislation/Regulation (1)
•
Meeting/Conference (1)
•
Newspaper/Magazine Article (26)
•
Press Release/Announcement (1)
•
Special or Theme Issue (1)
•
Tools/Toolkit (1)
Error Types
•
Epidemiology of Errors and Adverse Events (47)
•
Active Errors (36)
•
Latent Errors (14)
Approach to Improving Safety
< All
Computerized Adverse Event Detection
Clinical Areas
•
Medicine (110)
•
Nursing (8)
•
Pharmacy (48)
Target Audience
•
Health Care Providers (97)
•
Health Care Executives and Administrators (115)
•
Non-Health Care Professionals (98)
•
Patients (6)
Setting of Care
•
Hospitals (97)
•
Residential Facilities (2)
•
Ambulatory Care (22)
•
Outpatient Surgery (3)
1 - 20
of 155
Show Excerpt
Don't Show Excerpt
Sort by relevance
Sort by significance
Sort by title
Sort by date
Sort by author
dropdown
STUDY
Assessing the value of electronic prescribing in ambulatory care: A focus group study.
Weingart SN, Massagli M, Cyrulik A, et al. Int J Med Inform. 2009;78:571-578.
STUDY
Using an electronic prescribing system to ensure accurate medication lists in a large multidisciplinary medical group.
Stock R, Scott J, Gurtel S. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009;35:271-279.
STUDY
Impact of implementing alerts about medication black-box warnings in electronic health records.
Yu DT, Seger DL, Lasser KE, et al. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;20:192-202.
STUDY
Electronic health record-based surveillance of diagnostic errors in primary care.
Singh H, Giardina TD, Forjuoh SN, et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;22:93-100.
STUDY
Preventing potentially inappropriate medication use in hospitalized older patients with a computerized provider order entry warning system.
Mattison MLP, Afonso KA, Ngo LH, Mukamal KJ. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:1331-1336.
STUDY
Impact of non-interruptive medication laboratory monitoring alerts in ambulatory care.
Lo HG, Matheny ME, Seger DL, Bates DW, Gandhi TK. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16:66-71.
STUDY
Prescribers' interactions with medication alerts at the point of prescribing: a multi-method, in situ investigation of the human–computer interaction.
Russ AL, Zillich AJ, McManus MS, Doebbeling BN, Saleem JJ. Int J Med Inform. 2012;81:232-243.
STUDY
Experience with a trigger tool for identifying adverse drug events among older adults in ambulatory primary care.
Singh R, McLean-Plunckett EA, Kee R, et al. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:199-204.
STUDY
Identifying causes of adverse events detected by an automated trigger tool through in-depth analysis.
Muething SE, Conway PH, Kloppenborg E, et al. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:435-439.
STUDY
Signal and noise: applying a laboratory trigger tool to identify adverse drug events among primary care patients.
Brenner S, Detz A, López A, Horton C, Sarkar U. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21:670-675.
STUDY
Critical drug–drug interactions for use in electronic health records systems with computerized physician order entry: review of leading approaches.
Classen DC, Phansalkar S, Bates DW. J Patient Saf. 2011;7:61-65.
STUDY
The impact of prescribing safety alerts for elderly persons in an electronic medical record: an interrupted time series evaluation.
Smith DH, Perrin N, Feldstein A, et al. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1098-1104.
STUDY
A mixed method study of the merits of e-prescribing drug alerts in primary care.
Lapane KL, Waring ME, Schneider KL, Dubé C, Quilliam BJ. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:442-446.
NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE ARTICLE
Medication errors occurring with the use of bar-code administration technology.
PA-PSRS Patient Saf Advis. December 2008;5:122-126.
REVIEW
Overriding of drug safety alerts in computerized physician order entry.
van der Sijs H, Aarts J, Vulto A, Berg M. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13:138-147.
STUDY
Outpatient adverse drug events identified by screening electronic health records.
Gandhi TK, Seger AC, Overhage JM, et al. J Patient Saf. 2010;6;91-96.
STUDY
A randomized trial of the effectiveness of on-demand versus computer-triggered drug decision support in primary care.
Tamblyn R, Huang A, Taylor L, et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15:430-438.
STUDY
Comparison of computerized surveillance and manual chart review for adverse events.
Tinoco A, Evans RS, Staes CJ, Lloyd JF, Rothschild JM, Haug PJ. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18:491-497.
NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE ARTICLE
CPOE: it don't come easy.
Anderson HJ. Health Data Manag. January 1, 2009;17:18.
STUDY
Relationship between medication event rates and the Leapfrog computerized physician order entry evaluation tool.
Leung AA, Keohane C, Lipsitz S, et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Apr 18; [Epub ahead of print].
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Next >