AHRQ Patient Safety Network

The Collection > Computerized Adverse Event Detection

Narrow By

clear selections

Safety Target

•Device-related Complications (5)

•Diagnostic Errors (9)

•Identification Errors (1)

•Discontinuities, Gaps, and Hand-Off Problems (13)

•Fatigue and Sleep Deprivation (1)

•Medication Safety (110)

•Medical Complications (22)

•Nonsurgical Procedural Complications (2)

•Surgical Complications (12)

•Transfusion Complications (1)

•Psychological and Social Complications (1)

Origin/Sponsor

•Asia (1)

•Australia and New Zealand (5)

•Europe (18)

•North America (126)

Resource Types

•Book/Report (1)

•Journal Article (126)

•Legislation/Regulation (1)

•Meeting/Conference (1)

•Newspaper/Magazine Article (25)

•Press Release/Announcement (1)

•Special or Theme Issue (1)

•Tools/Toolkit (1)

Error Types

•Epidemiology of Errors and Adverse Events (47)

•Active Errors (36)

•Latent Errors (14)

Approach to Improving Safety
< All

Computerized Adverse Event Detection

Clinical Areas

•Medicine (111)

•Nursing (8)

•Pharmacy (47)

Target Audience

•Health Care Providers (98)

•Health Care Executives and Administrators (117)

•Non-Health Care Professionals (98)

•Patients (6)

Setting of Care

•Hospitals (98)

•Residential Facilities (2)

•Ambulatory Care (23)

•Outpatient Surgery (3)

1 - 20 of 157

Show ExcerptDon't Show Excerpt

dropdown

STUDY

Identifying causes of adverse events detected by an automated trigger tool through in-depth analysis.

Muething SE, Conway PH, Kloppenborg E, et al. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:435-439.

STUDY

Characteristics of medication errors and adverse drug events in hospitals participating in the California Pediatric Patient Safety Initiative.

Takata GS, Taketomo CK, Waite S; for the California Pediatric Patient Safety Initiative. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008;65:2036-2044.

STUDY

Preventing potentially inappropriate medication use in hospitalized older patients with a computerized provider order entry warning system.

Mattison MLP, Afonso KA, Ngo LH, Mukamal KJ. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:1331-1336.

NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE ARTICLE

Shakespeare was on target—don't be a borrower or lender.

ISMP Medication Safety Alert! Acute Care Edition. November 19, 2009;14:1-3.

NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE ARTICLE

Scanner beep only means the barcode has been scanned.

ISMP Medication Safety Alert! Acute Care Edition. June 30, 2011;16:1-2.

STUDY

Sustaining and spreading the reduction of adverse drug events in a multicenter collaborative.

Tham E, Calmes HM, Poppy A, et al. Pediatrics. 2011;128:e438-e445.

STUDY

Critical drug–drug interactions for use in electronic health records systems with computerized physician order entry: review of leading approaches.

Classen DC, Phansalkar S, Bates DW. J Patient Saf. 2011;7:61-65.

STUDY

Bar code medication administration technology: characterization of high-alert medication triggers and clinician workarounds.

Miller DF, Fortier CR, Garrison KL. Ann Pharmacother. 2011;45:162-168.

STUDY

Can surveillance systems identify and avert adverse drug events? A prospective evaluation of a commercial application.

Jha AK, Laguette J, Seger A, Bates DW. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15:647-653.

STUDY

Clinical and safety impact of an inpatient pharmacist-directed anticoagulation service.

Schillig J, Kaatz S, Hudson M, Krol GD, Szandzik EG, Kalus JS. J Hosp Med. 2011;6:322-328.

STUDY

Impact of health information technology on detection of potential adverse drug events at the ordering stage.

Roberts LL, Ward MM, Brokel JM, Wakefield DS, Crandall DK, Conlon P. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2010;67:1838-1846.

STUDY

Comparison of traditional trigger tool to data warehouse based screening for identifying hospital adverse events.

O'Leary KJ, Devisetty VK, Patel AR, et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22:130-138.

STUDY

Predictive value of alert triggers for identification of developing adverse drug events.

Moore C, Li J, Hung CC, Downs J, Nebeker JR. J Patient Saf. 2009;5:223-228.

STUDY

From research to practice: factors affecting implementation of prospective targeted injury-detection systems.

Sorensen AV, Harrison MI, Kane HL, Roussel AE, Halpern MT, Bernard SL. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20:527-533.

STUDY

Analysis of overridden alerts in a drug–drug interaction detection system.

Mille F, Schwartz C, Brion F, et al. Int J Qual Health Care. 2008 Dec; 20:400-5.

STUDY

Relationship between medication event rates and the Leapfrog computerized physician order entry evaluation tool.

Leung AA, Keohane C, Lipsitz S, et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Apr 18; [Epub ahead of print].

STUDY

Impact of implementing alerts about medication black-box warnings in electronic health records.

Yu DT, Seger DL, Lasser KE, et al. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;20:192-202.

STUDY

Comparison of computerized surveillance and manual chart review for adverse events.

Tinoco A, Evans RS, Staes CJ, Lloyd JF, Rothschild JM, Haug PJ. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18:491-497.

REVIEW

Systematic review of medication safety assessment methods.

Meyer-Massetti C, Cheng CM, Schwappach DL, et al. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2011;68:227-240.

STUDY

Multimodal system designed to reduce errors in recording and administration of drugs in anaesthesia: prospective randomised clinical evaluation.

Merry AF, Webster CS, Hannam J, et al. BMJ. 2011;343:d5543.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next >