{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
Skip Navigation
www.ahrq.gov
search
home
whatsnew
collection
primers
glossary
newsletter
mypsnet
newsletter
The Collection
>
Canada
PATIENT SAFETY PRIMERS
Narrow By
clear selections
Safety Target
•
Device-related Complications (10)
•
Diagnostic Errors (13)
•
Identification Errors (3)
•
Discontinuities, Gaps, and Hand-Off Problems (33)
•
Fatigue and Sleep Deprivation (5)
•
Medication Safety (82)
•
Medical Complications (35)
•
Nonsurgical Procedural Complications (4)
•
Surgical Complications (25)
•
Transfusion Complications (2)
•
Psychological and Social Complications (7)
Origin/Sponsor
< All
Canada
Resource Types
•
Audiovisual (1)
•
Book/Report (14)
•
Journal Article (217)
•
Legislation/Regulation (1)
•
Meeting/Conference (3)
•
Newspaper/Magazine Article (3)
•
Special or Theme Issue (11)
•
Tools/Toolkit (3)
•
Web Resource (10)
•
Grant (1)
Error Types
•
Epidemiology of Errors and Adverse Events (86)
•
Active Errors (36)
•
Latent Errors (12)
•
Near Miss (7)
Approach to Improving Safety
•
Quality Improvement Strategies (59)
•
Legal and Policy Approaches (15)
•
Error Reporting and Analysis (90)
•
Communication Improvement (52)
•
Human Factors Engineering (33)
•
Teamwork (19)
•
Specialization of Care (13)
•
Logistical Approaches (22)
•
Culture of Safety (36)
•
Technologic Approaches (46)
•
Education and Training (48)
Clinical Areas
•
Allied Health Services (1)
•
Medicine (173)
•
Nursing (18)
•
Pharmacy (19)
Target Audience
•
Health Care Providers (187)
•
Health Care Executives and Administrators (205)
•
Non-Health Care Professionals (102)
•
Patients (11)
Setting of Care
•
Hospitals (150)
•
Psychiatric Facilities (1)
•
Residential Facilities (5)
•
Ambulatory Care (25)
•
Outpatient Surgery (2)
•
Patient Transport (4)
1 - 20
of 264
Show Excerpt
Don't Show Excerpt
Sort by relevance
Sort by significance
Sort by title
Sort by date
Sort by author
dropdown
STUDY
Medication reconciliation during internal hospital transfer and impact of computerized prescriber order entry.
Lee JY, Leblanc K, Fernandes OA, et al. Ann Pharmacother. 2010;44:1887-1895.
STUDY
A systematic review to evaluate the accuracy of electronic adverse drug event detection.
Forster AJ, Jennings A, Chow C, Leeder C, van Walraven C. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19:31-38.
STUDY
Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.
Hunt DL, Haynes RB, Hanna SE, Smith K. JAMA. 1998;280:1339-1346.
REVIEW
The efficacy of computer-enabled discharge communication interventions: a systematic review.
Motamedi SM, Posadas-Calleja J, Straus S, et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20:403-415.
STUDY
Communication errors in dispatch of air medical transport.
Vilensky D, Macdonald RD. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011;15:39-43.
SPECIAL OR THEME ISSUE
Patient Safety Papers 6.
Baker GR, ed. Healthc Q. 2012;15:1-72.
NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE ARTICLE
Electronic prescribing vulnerabilities: height and weight mix-up leads to dosing error.
ISMP Medication Safety Alert! Acute Care Edition. August 26, 2010;15:1-3.
STUDY
Electronic prescribing in an ambulatory care setting: a cluster randomized trial.
Dainty KN, Adhikari NK, Kiss A, Quan S, Zwarenstein M. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18:761-767.
STUDY
Clinical application of a computerized system for physician order entry with clinical decision support to prevent adverse drug events in long-term care.
Rochon PA, Field TS, Bates DW, et al. CMAJ. 2006;174:52-54.
STUDY
Does user-centred design affect the efficiency, usability and safety of CPOE order sets?
Chan J, Shojania KG, Easty AC, Etchells EE. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18:276-281.
BOOK/REPORT
Patient Safety in Canada: An Update.
Ottawa, ON, Canada: Canadian Institute for Health Information; August 14, 2007.
COMMENTARY
Transfer of accountability: transforming shift handover to enhance patient safety.
Alvarado K, Lee R, Christoffersen E, et al. Healthc Q. 2006;9(special issue):75-79.
REVIEW
Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.
Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, et al. JAMA. 2005;293:1223-1238.
COMMENTARY
The Canadian interprofessional patient safety competencies: their role in health-care professionals' education.
King J, Anderson CM. J Patient Saf. 2012;8:30-35.
STUDY
Usability of a computerised drug monitoring programme to detect adverse drug events and non-compliance in outpatient ambulatory care.
Auger C, Forster AJ, Oake N, Tamblyn R. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22:306-316.
STUDY
Error rates in breast imaging reports: comparison of automatic speech recognition and dictation transcription.
Basma S, Lord B, Jacks LM, Rizk M, Scaranelo AM. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:923-927.
STUDY
The development and evaluation of an integrated electronic prescribing and drug management system for primary care.
Tamblyn R, Huang A, Kawasumi Y, et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13:148-159.
STUDY
Self-reported medical, medication and laboratory error in eight countries: risk factors for chronically ill adults.
Scobie A. Int J Qual Health Care. 2011;23:182-186.
STUDY
Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies.
Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN. JAMA. 1998;279:1200-1205
REVIEW
The effect of computerized physician order entry with clinical decision support on the rates of adverse drug events: a systematic review.
Wolfstadt JI, Gurwitz JH, Field TS, et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:451-458.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Next >