Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Review

Double checking the administration of medicines: what is the evidence? A systematic review.

Alsulami Z, Conroy S, Choonara I. Double checking the administration of medicines: what is the evidence? A systematic review. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97(9):833-7. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2011-301093.

Save
Print
October 3, 2012
Alsulami Z, Conroy S, Choonara I. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97(9):833-7.
View more articles from the same authors.

Double-checking of medication administration by two qualified health professionals is meant to reduce the risk of medication errors. However, prior experience with this practice has raised numerous potential problems. This systematic review examined the limited evidence base for medication administration double-checking. The majority of included studies were qualitative and consisted of asking nurses whether they felt double-checking was likely to result in fewer medication errors. Three quantitative studies showed a modest decrease in error rates. The authors found insufficient evidence to either support or refute the practice of double-checking. Despite this lack of evidence, manual double-checking has been a previously recommended strategy and has become standard policy for high-risk medications at many hospitals.

Save
Print
Cite
Citation

Alsulami Z, Conroy S, Choonara I. Double checking the administration of medicines: what is the evidence? A systematic review. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97(9):833-7. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2011-301093.

Related Resources From the Same Author(s)
Related Resources