Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Commentary

Supporting second victims of patient safety events: shouldn't these communications be covered by legal privilege?

de Wit ME, Marks CM, Natterman JP, et al. Supporting second victims of patient safety events: shouldn't these communications be covered by legal privilege? J Law Med Ethics. 2013;41(4):852-8, Table of Contents. doi:10.1111/jlme.12095.

Save
Print
February 12, 2014
de Wit ME, Marks CM, Natterman JP, et al. J Law Med Ethics. 2013;41(4):852-8, Table of Contents.
View more articles from the same authors.

Reviewing physician–patient privilege laws in five states, this commentary illustrates substantial variation in legal protections provided for second victim programs and recommends clear legislation for clinicians who seek support.

Save
Print
Cite
Citation

de Wit ME, Marks CM, Natterman JP, et al. Supporting second victims of patient safety events: shouldn't these communications be covered by legal privilege? J Law Med Ethics. 2013;41(4):852-8, Table of Contents. doi:10.1111/jlme.12095.

Related Resources From the Same Author(s)
Related Resources