{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
Skip Navigation
www.ahrq.gov
search
home
whatsnew
collection
primers
glossary
newsletter
mypsnet
newsletter
The Collection
>
Prevention of retained surgical sponges: a decision-analytic model predicting relative cost-effectiveness.
Regenbogen SE, Greenberg CC, Resch SC, et al. Surgery. 2009;145:527-535.
A cost-effectiveness analysis model was used to assess the utility of three methods for preventing retained surgical sponges: bar-coded sponges,
radiofrequency ID–tagged
sponges, and standard x-ray screening. The newer technologies were found to be more cost effective.
PubMed citation
Available at
Related Resources
COMMENTARY
Video technology to advance safety in the operating room and perioperative environment.
Xiao Y, Schimpff S, Mackenzie C, et al. Surg Innov. 2007;14:52-61.
COMMENTARY
Duke Surgery Patient Safety: an open-source application for anonymous reporting of adverse and near-miss surgical events.
Pietrobon R, Lima R, Shah A, et al. Ann Surg Innov Res. 2007;1:5.
NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE ARTICLE
Sponges, surgical instruments miscounted in 13% of surgeries.
O'Reilly KB. American Medical News. September 22, 2008;51:14.
STUDY
Impact of a computerized physician order-entry system.
Stone WM, Smith BE, Shaft JD, Nelson RD, Money SR. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:960-967.
View all related resources...
Download:
Adobe Reader
Email
Find Related Resources by...
Resource Type
Study
Setting of Care
Operating Room
Target Audience
Health Care Executives and Administrators
Information Professionals
Clinical Area
Surgery
Safety Target
Retained Surgical Instruments and Sponges
Error Types
Active Errors
Approach to Improving Safety
Technologic Approaches
Bar Coding and Radiofrequency ID Tagging
Origin/Sponsor
United States of America