Prevention of retained surgical sponges: a decision-analytic model predicting relative cost-effectiveness.
Regenbogen SE, Greenberg CC, Resch SC, et al. Surgery. 2009;145:527-535.
A cost-effectiveness analysis model was used to assess the utility of three methods for preventing retained surgical sponges: bar-coded sponges,
sponges, and standard x-ray screening. The newer technologies were found to be more cost effective.
Video technology to advance safety in the operating room and perioperative environment.
Xiao Y, Schimpff S, Mackenzie C, et al. Surg Innov. 2007;14:52-61.
Duke Surgery Patient Safety: an open-source application for anonymous reporting of adverse and near-miss surgical events.
Pietrobon R, Lima R, Shah A, et al. Ann Surg Innov Res. 2007;1:5.
Sponges, surgical instruments miscounted in 13% of surgeries.
O'Reilly KB. American Medical News. September 22, 2008;51:14.
Impact of a computerized physician order-entry system.
Stone WM, Smith BE, Shaft JD, Nelson RD, Money SR. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:960-967.
View all related resources...
Find Related Resources by...
Setting of Care
Health Care Executives and Administrators
Retained Surgical Instruments and Sponges
Approach to Improving Safety
Bar Coding and Radiofrequency ID Tagging
United States of America
Produced for the
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
team of editors
University of California, San Francisco
with guidance from a prominent
. The AHRQ PSNet site was designed and implemented by Silverchair.
Contact AHRQ PSNet
Terms & Conditions
Freedom of Information Act
The White House
USA.gov: U.S. Government Official Web Portal
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality • 540 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 20850 • Telephone: (301) 427-1364