Skip Navigation
The Collection >
Interruptions and distractions in healthcare: review and reappraisal. Classic icon
Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Karsh BT. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:304-312.

The majority of individual errors are due to failure to perform automatic or reflexive actions. A major risk factor for these "slips" is being interrupted or distracted while performing a task. This review examined the literature on the incidence, risk factors, and effects of interruptions in several clinical settings, ranging from outpatient clinics to the operating room. Although distractions are common and may be associated with increased risk for error, particularly if they occur during medication administration or signout, the authors point out that many interruptions may be necessary to communicate urgent clinical information. They argue for complexity theory–based research to delineate the harmful and beneficial aspects of interruptions, rather than for interventions that seek to simply eliminate interruptions. Checklists have been widely adopted as a means of preventing errors of omission, which may be precipitated by interruptions.

PubMed citation icon indicating hyperlink to external website
Available at icon indicating hyperlink to external website
white box
Related Resources
COMMENTARY
Fixing healthcare from the inside, today.
Spear SJ. Harv Bus Rev. September 2005;83:78-91.
BOOK/REPORT
The Silent Treatment: Why Safety Tools and Checklists Aren't Enough to Save Lives.
Maxfield D, Grenny J, Lavandero R, Groah L. Provo, UT: VitalSmarts; 2011.
STUDY
Determinants of patient-reported medication errors: a comparison among seven countries.
Lu CY, Roughead E. Int J Clin Pract. 2011;65:733-740.
COMMENTARY
Critical conversations: a call for a nonprocedural "time out."
Sehgal NL, Fox M, Sharpe BA, Vidyarthi AR, Blegen M, Wachter RM. J Hosp Med. 2011;6:157-162.
View all related resources...
white box
Download: Adobe Reader   email icon Email
tan box
white box