Skip Navigation
The Collection >
Decisions about critical events in device-related scenarios as a function of expertise.
Laxmisan A, Malhotra S, Keselman A, Johnson TR, Patel VL. J Biomed Inform. 2005;38:200-212.

Using the concepts of "sharp" and "blunt" ends of practice, this article explores health professionals' differing opinions on biomedical device-related errors. Investigators requested that study participants express their views on events surrounding three true-error scenarios. Analysis of the transcribed responses revealed that interpretation varied widely between groups. While clinicians focused on clinical and human factors, biomedical engineers focused on device-related issues, and administrators emphasized documentation and training. The authors conclude that individual expertise largely mediates an error analysis, as no single interpretation provides a comprehensive view of all contributing factors.

PubMed citation icon indicating hyperlink to external website
Available at icon indicating hyperlink to external website
white box
Related Resources
STUDY
Medication safety in the ambulatory chemotherapy setting.
Gandhi TK, Bartel SB, Shulman LN, et al. Cancer. 2005;104:2477-2483.
STUDY
Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: cross sectional surveys.
Sexton JB, Thomas EJ, Helmreich RL. BMJ. 2000;320:745-749.
View all related resources...
white box
Download: Adobe Reader   email icon Email
tan box
Find Related Resources by...
Resource Type   
 style=
Target Audience  
 style=
Clinical Area  
 style=
Safety Target  
 style=
Approach to Improving Safety  
 style=
Origin/Sponsor  
white box