Skip Navigation
The Collection >
Toward improving patient safety through voluntary peer-to-peer assessment.
Hudson DW, Holzmueller CG, Pronovost PJ, et al. Am J Med Qual. 2012;27:201-220.

To detect and analyze errors, health care has traditionally relied on retrospective methods such as incident reporting and root cause analysis. This commentary draws a contrast between this approach and that used in the nuclear power industry, which focuses on prospective error detection through the use of a robust peer-to-peer assessment process. Nuclear power facilities can request peer review by an independent non-regulatory body, which conducts a detailed safety assessment and makes specific recommendations for safety improvement. The authors recommend developing a similar process for hospitals and discuss barriers that would need to be overcome in order to implement such a process.

PubMed citation icon indicating hyperlink to external website
Available at icon indicating hyperlink to external website
white box
Related Resources
COMMENTARY
Smart pumps: advanced capabilities and continuous quality improvement.
Vanderveen T. Patient Saf Quality Healthc. January/February 2007.
NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE ARTICLE
'Never' land.
Carpenter D. Hosp Health Netw. November 2007;81:34-38.
BOOK/REPORT
The Patient Safety Initiative at America’s Public Hospitals: The Year One Overview.
Research Brief. Washington, DC: National Association of Public Hospitals and Health Systems; January 2011.
STUDY
Identifying hospital organizational strategies to reduce readmissions.
Ahmad FS, Metlay JP, Barg FK, Henderson RR, Werner RM. Am J Med Qual. 2012 Nov 1; [Epub ahead of print].
View all related resources...
white box
Download: Adobe Reader   email icon Email
tan box
Find Related Resources by...
Resource Type   
 style=
Setting of Care  
 style=
Target Audience  
 style=
Clinical Area  
 style=
Approach to Improving Safety  
 style=
Origin/Sponsor  
white box