Skip Navigation
The Collection >
Surgical specimen identification errors: a new measure of quality in surgical care.
Makary MA, Epstein J, Pronovost PJ, Millman EA, Hartmann EC, Freischlag JA. Surgery. 2007;141:450-455.

This study examined more than 21,000 surgical specimens and estimated a surgical specimen identification error rate of 4.3 per 1000 specimens. Error rates were higher for specimens associated with a biopsy procedure and the outpatient setting. The authors point out that specimen mislabeling represents one type of communication error and that certain strategies may prevent these events. The Joint Commission has addressed specimen labeling in their National Patient Safety Goals; the ability of hospital systems to prevent these errors may serve as a marker of quality and safety.

PubMed citation icon indicating hyperlink to external website
Available at icon indicating hyperlink to external website
white box
Related Resources
STUDY
Bridging the communication gap in the operating room with medical team training.
Awad SS, Fagan SP, Bellows C, et al. Am J Surg. 2005;190:770-774.
ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY/GUIDELINES
Recommendations for quality assurance and improvement in surgical and autopsy pathology.
Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology. Hum Pathol. 2006;37:985-988.
View all related resources...
white box
Download: Adobe Reader   email icon Email
tan box
white box