@article{1230, author = {Amy O'Brien and Kristin O'Reilly and Tenzin Dechen and Nicholas Demosthenes and Veronica Kelly and Lynn Mackinson and Juliann Corey and Kathryn Zieja and Jennifer P. Stevens and Michael N. Cocchi}, title = {Redesigning Rounds in the ICU: Standardizing Key Elements Improves Interdisciplinary Communication.}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Daily multidisciplinary rounds (MDR) in the ICU represent a mechanism by which health care professionals from different disciplines and specialties can meet to synthesize data, think collectively, and form complete patient care plans. It was hypothesized that providing a standardized, structured approach to the daily rounds process would improve communication and collaboration in seven distinct ICUs in a single academic medical center.

METHODS: Lean-inspired methodology and information provided by frontline staff regarding inefficiencies and barriers to optimal team functioning were used in designing a toolkit for standardization of rounds in the ICUs. Staff perceptions about communication were measured, and direct observations of rounds were conducted before and after implementation of the intervention.

RESULTS: After implementation of the intervention, nurse participation during presentation of patient data increased from 17/47 (36.2%) to 56/78 (71.8%) (p < 0.0002) in the surgical ICUs and from 8/23 (34.8%) to 107/107 (100%) (p <0.0001) in the medical ICUs. Nurse participation during generation of the daily plan increased in the surgical ICUs from 24/47 (51.1%) to 63/78 (80.8%) (p = 0.0005) and from 7/23 (30.4%) to 106/107 (99.1%) (p < 0.0001) in the medical ICUs. Miscommunications and errors were corrected in nearly half of the rounding episodes observed.

CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the implementation of a simple toolkit that can be incorporated into existing work flow and rounding culture in several different types of ICUs can result in improvements in engagement of nursing staff and in overall communication.

}, year = {2018}, journal = {Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf}, volume = {44}, pages = {590-598}, month = {12/2018}, issn = {1553-7250}, doi = {10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.01.006}, language = {eng}, }