@article{1253,
  keywords = {adverse drug event, adverse drug event surveillance, automated medication monitoring system, critically ill, drug related hazardous condition, intensive care unit, medication safety, trigger alert},
  author = {Mitchell S. Buckley and Jeffrey R. Rasmussen and Dale S. Bikin and Emily C. Richards and Andrew J. Berry and Mark A. Culver and Ryan M. Rivosecchi and Sandra L. Kane-Gill},
  title = {Trigger alerts associated with laboratory abnormalities on identifying potentially preventable adverse drug events in the intensive care unit and general ward.},
  abstract = {<p><b>Background: </b>Medication safety strategies involving trigger alerts have demonstrated potential in identifying drug-related hazardous conditions (DRHCs) and preventing adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. However, trigger alert effectiveness between intensive care unit (ICU) and general ward patients remains unknown. The objective was to investigate trigger alert performance in accurately identifying DRHCs associated with laboratory abnormalities in ICU and non-ICU settings.</p><p><b>Methods: </b>This retrospective, observational study was conducted at a university hospital over a 1-year period involving 20 unique trigger alerts aimed at identifying possible drug-induced laboratory abnormalities. The primary outcome was to determine the positive predictive value (PPV) in distinguishing drug-induced abnormal laboratory values using trigger alerts in critically ill and general ward patients. Aberrant lab values attributed to medications without resulting in an actual adverse event ensuing were categorized as a DRHC.</p><p><b>Results: </b>A total of 634 patients involving 870 trigger alerts were included. The distribution of trigger alerts generated occurred more commonly in general ward patients (59.8%) than those in the ICU (40.2%). The overall PPV in detecting a DRHC in all hospitalized patients was 0.29, while the PPV in non-ICU patients (0.31) was significantly higher than the critically ill (0.25) ( = 0.03). However, the rate of DRHCs was significantly higher in the ICU than the general ward (7.49  0.87 events per 1000 patient days, respectively,  < 0.0001). Although most DRHCs were considered mild or moderate in severity, more serious and life-threatening DRHCs occurred in the ICU compared with the general ward (39.8%  12.4%, respectively,  < 0.001).</p><p><b>Conclusions: </b>Overall, most trigger alerts performed poorly in detecting DRHCs irrespective of patient care setting. Continuous process improvement practices should be applied to trigger alert performance to improve clinician time efficiency and minimize alert fatigue.</p>},
  year = {2018},
  journal = {Ther Adv Drug Saf},
  volume = {9},
  pages = {207-217},
  month = {04/2018},
  issn = {2042-0986},
  doi = {10.1177/2042098618760995},
  language = {eng},
}