@article{14222,
  author = {Kelly T. Gleason and Susan M. Peterson and Cheryl R Dennison Himmelfarb and Mariel Villanueva and Taylor Wynn and Paula Bondal and Daniel Berg and Welcome Jerde and David E. Newman-Toker},
  title = {Feasibility of patient-reported diagnostic errors following emergency department discharge: a pilot study},
  abstract = {<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec id="j_dx-2020-0014_abs_001_w2aab3b7b1b1b6b1aab1c13b1Aa"><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>The National Academy of Medicine identified diagnostic error as a pressing public health concern and defined failure to effectively communicate the diagnosis to patients as a diagnostic error. Leveraging Patient’s Experience to improve Diagnosis (LEAPED) is a new program for measuring patient-reported diagnostic error. As a first step, we sought to assess the feasibility of using LEAPED after emergency department (ED) discharge.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="j_dx-2020-0014_abs_002_w2aab3b7b1b1b6b1aab1c13b2Aa"><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>We deployed LEAPED using a cohort design at three EDs within one academic health system. We enrolled 59 patients after ED discharge and queried them about their health status and understanding of the explanation for their health problems at 2-weeks, 1-month, and 3-months. We measured response rates and demographic/clinical predictors of patient uptake of LEAPED.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="j_dx-2020-0014_abs_003_w2aab3b7b1b1b6b1aab1c13b3Aa"><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Of those enrolled (n=59), 90% (n=53) responded to the 2-week post-ED discharge questionnaire (1 and 3-month ongoing). Of the six non-responders, one died and three were hospitalized at two weeks. The average age was 50 years (SD 16) and 64% were female; 53% were white and 41% were black. Over a fifth (23%) reported they were not given an explanation of their health problem on leaving the ED, and of those, a fourth (25%) did not have an understanding of what next steps to take after leaving the ED.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="j_dx-2020-0014_abs_004_w2aab3b7b1b1b6b1aab1c13b4Aa"><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Patient uptake of LEAPED was high, suggesting that patient-report may be a feasible method of evaluating the effectiveness of diagnostic communication to patients though further testing in a broader patient population is essential. Future research should determine if LEAPED yields important insights into the quality and safety of diagnostic care.</jats:p></jats:sec>},
  year = {2021},
  journal = {Diagnosis (Berl)},
  volume = {8},
  pages = {187-192},
  month = {10/2020},
  issn = {2194-802X},
  doi = {10.1515/dx-2020-0014},
}