@article{157,
  keywords = {Adverse events, Medication safety, Moral distress},
  author = {Peter Dodek and Monica Norena and Najib Ayas and Vinay Dhingra and Glen Brown and Hubert Wong},
  title = {Moral distress in intensive care unit personnel is not consistently associated with adverse medication events and other adverse events.},
  abstract = {<p><b>PURPOSE: </b>To examine the association between moral distress in ICU personnel, and medication errors and adverse events, and other adverse events.</p><p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS: </b>In 13 ICUs, we measured moral distress once in all ICU staff, and incidence of five explicity-defined adverse safety events over 2 years. In 10 of the ICUs, pharmacists tabulated medication errors and adverse events during 1 day in the 2-year period. Average moral distress scores for each professional group were correlated with each safety measure.</p><p><b>RESULTS: </b>In the pharmacy study, there were almost no significant correlations between moral distress and measures of medication safety. However, higher moral distress in nurses was associated with more interceptions of near misses per administration error (r = 0.68, p = 0.04), and higher moral distress in physicians was associated with more incorrect measurements for medication monitoring per recommended action for monitoring (r = 0.68, p = 0.03). For the other adverse events, the only significant association was a positive association between moral distress in physicians and bleeding while on anticoagulants (OR: 1.1; 95% CI: 1.0-1.3).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION: </b>Moral distress in ICU personnel is generally not associated with medication errors or adverse events, or other adverse events, but it may be associated with both hyper-vigilance and distraction.</p>},
  year = {2019},
  journal = {J Crit Care},
  volume = {53},
  pages = {258-263},
  month = {10/2019},
  issn = {1557-8615},
  doi = {10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.06.023},
  language = {eng},
}