@article{2372, keywords = {cancer, diagnosis, emergency, opportunities, primary care}, author = {Gary A. Abel and Silvia C. Mendonca and Sean McPhail and Yin Zhou and Lucy Elliss-Brookes and Georgios Lyratzopoulos}, title = {Emergency diagnosis of cancer and previous general practice consultations: insights from linked patient survey data.}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Emergency diagnosis of cancer is common and aetiologically complex. The proportion of emergency presenters who have consulted previously with relevant symptoms is uncertain.

AIM: To examine how many patients with cancer, who were diagnosed as emergencies, have had previous primary care consultations with relevant symptoms; and among those, to examine how many had multiple consultations.

DESIGN AND SETTING: Secondary analysis of patient survey data from the 2010 English Cancer Patient Experience Survey (CPES), previously linked to population-based data on diagnostic route.

METHOD: For emergency presenters with 18 different cancers, associations were examined for two outcomes (prior GP consultation status; and 'three or more consultations' among prior consultees) using logistic regression.

RESULTS: Among 4647 emergency presenters, 1349 (29%) reported no prior consultations, being more common in males (32% versus 25% in females, <0.001), older (44% in ≥85 versus 30% in 65-74-year-olds, <0.001), and the most deprived (35% versus 25% least deprived, = 0.001) patients; and highest/lowest for patients with brain cancer (46%) and mesothelioma (13%), respectively (<0.001 for overall variation by cancer site). Among 3298 emergency presenters with prior consultations, 1356 (41%) had three or more consultations, which were more likely in females (<0.001), younger (<0.001), and non-white patients ( = 0.017) and those with multiple myeloma, and least likely for patients with leukaemia (<0.001).

CONCLUSION: Contrary to suggestions that emergency presentations represent missed diagnoses, about one-third of emergency presenters (particularly those in older and more deprived groups) have no prior GP consultations. Furthermore, only about one-third report multiple (three or more) consultations, which are more likely in 'harder-to-suspect' groups.

}, year = {2017}, journal = {Br J Gen Pract}, volume = {67}, pages = {e377-e387}, month = {06/2017}, issn = {1478-5242}, doi = {10.3399/bjgp17X690869}, language = {eng}, }