@article{2564, keywords = {emergency, medical apology, medical error}, author = {Heather A. Heaton and Ronna L. Campbell and Kristine M. Thompson and Annie T. Sadosty}, title = {In Support of the Medical Apology: The Nonlegal Arguments.}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: More than 30 million people are affected annually by medical errors. Apologies can heal patients, families, and providers and, if deployed and structured appropriately, can enrich clinical encounters-yet they rarely occur.

OBJECTIVES: This article will address the nonlegal arguments in favor of the medical apology and discuss a structure for delivering a meaningful apology. In addition, we will review reasons why some providers feel compelled to apologize while others faced with similar circumstances do not.

DISCUSSION: Medical apologies bring value to both patients and providers. Apologies can preserve therapeutic relationships and save careers for professionals by restoring their self-respect and dignity. The four R's of the ideal apology-recognition, responsibility, regret, and remedy-provide a framework to help providers apologize for unintended outcomes. When deployed and structured appropriately, apologies can heal patients, families, and providers and can enrich clinical encounters.

CONCLUSION: For providers, forgiving one's self is key to professional wellbeing and continued effective practice. For patients, apologies are desirable and also serve as a conduit for often wanted emotional support from their physician.

}, year = {2016}, journal = {J Emerg Med}, volume = {51}, pages = {605-609}, month = {11/2016}, issn = {0736-4679}, doi = {10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.06.048}, language = {eng}, }