@article{4543,
  author = {Thomas Vaughn and Mark Koepke and Samuel Levey and Eugene Kroch and Christopher Hatcher and Christopher Tompkins and Jure Baloh},
  title = {Governing board, C-suite, and clinical management perceptions of quality and safety structures, processes, and priorities in U.S. hospitals.},
  abstract = {<p>To achieve quality improvement in hospitals requires greater attention to systems thinking than is typical at this time, including a shared understanding across different levels of the hospital of the current state of quality improvement efforts. A self-administered survey assessed the perceptions of board members, C-suite executives, and clinical managers regarding quality activities and structures. This instrument, the Hospital Leadership and Quality Assessment Tool (HLQAT), includes 13 domains in six conceptual areas that we believe are major organizational drivers of quality and safety: (1) commitment of senior leaders, (2) a vision of exemplary quality, (3) a supportive culture, (4) accountable leadership, (5) appropriate organizational structures, and (6) adaptive capability. HLQAT survey results from a convenience sample of more than 300 hospitals were linked to performance on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Core Measures. The results show significantly different perceptions between the groups. Higher HLQAT scores for each respondent group were associated with better hospital performance on the CMS Core Measures. There is no magic bullet--no one domain dominates. Leaders in higher-performing hospitals appear to be more effective at conveying their vision of quality care and creating a culture that supports an expectation that staff and leadership will work across traditional boundaries to improve quality.</p>},
  year = {2014},
  journal = {J Healthc Manag},
  volume = {59},
  pages = {111-28},
  month = {12/2014},
  issn = {1096-9012},
  language = {eng},
}