@article{4951,
  author = {Gordon Schiff and Ann Louise Puopolo and Anne Huben-Kearney and Winnie Yu and Carol Keohane and Peggy McDonough and Bonnie R. Ellis and David W. Bates and Madeleine Biondolillo},
  title = {Primary care closed claims experience of Massachusetts malpractice insurers.},
  abstract = {<p><b>IMPORTANCE: </b>Despite prior focus on high-impact inpatient cases, there are increasing data and awareness that malpractice in the outpatient setting, particularly in primary care, is a leading contributor to malpractice risk and claims.</p><p><b>OBJECTIVE: </b>To study patterns of primary care malpractice types, causes, and outcomes as part of a Massachusetts ambulatory malpractice risk and safety improvement project.</p><p><b>DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: </b>Retrospective review of pooled closed claims data of 2 malpractice carriers covering most Massachusetts physicians during a 5-year period (January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2009). Data were harmonized between the 2 insurers using a standardized taxonomy. Primary care practices in Massachusetts. All malpractice claims that involved primary care practices insured by the 2 largest insurers in the state were screened. A total of 551 claims from primary care practices were identified for the analysis.</p><p><b>MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: </b>Numbers and types of claims, including whether claims involved primary care physicians or practices; classification of alleged malpractice (eg, misdiagnosis or medication error); patient diagnosis; breakdown in care process; and claim outcome (dismissed, settled, verdict for plaintiff, or verdict for defendant).</p><p><b>RESULTS: </b>During a 5-year period there were 7224 malpractice claims of which 551 (7.7%) were from primary care practices. Allegations were related to diagnosis in 397 (72.1%), medications in 68 (12.3%), other medical treatment in 41 (7.4%), communication in 15 (2.7%), patient rights in 11 (2.0%), and patient safety or security in 8 (1.5%). Leading diagnoses were cancer (n = 190), heart diseases (n = 43), blood vessel diseases (n = 27), infections (n = 22), and stroke (n = 16). Primary care cases were significantly more likely to be settled (35.2% vs 20.5%) or result in a verdict for the plaintiff (1.6% vs 0.9%) compared with non-general medical malpractice claims (P < .001).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: </b>In Massachusetts, most primary care claims filed are related to alleged misdiagnosis. Compared with malpractice allegations in other settings, primary care ambulatory claims appear to be more difficult to defend, with more cases settled or resulting in a verdict for the plaintiff.</p>},
  year = {2013},
  journal = {JAMA Intern Med},
  volume = {173},
  pages = {2063-8},
  month = {12/2013},
  issn = {2168-6114},
  doi = {10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11070},
  language = {eng},
}