PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize the extent to which hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) are preventable and to assess expectations, challenges, and barriers to improve patient outcomes.
RECENT FINDINGS: HAIs cause significant morbidity and mortality. Getting to zero HAIs is a commonly stated goal yet leads to unrealistic expectations. The extent to which all HAIs can be prevented remains debatable and is subject to multiple considerations and barriers. Current infection prevention science is inexact and evolving. Evidence-based infection prevention practices are often incompletely implemented and at times controversial. Highly sensitive surveillance results in overdiagnosis, calling into question the real incidence of HAIs. Perceived reductions in HAIs by gaming the system lead to false conclusions about preventability and may cause harm. Successful HAI reduction programs require executive oversight yet keeping hospital leaders engaged in infection prevention is a challenge given competing priorities. Medicine is not a physical science with precisely defined laws; thus, infection prevention interventions are subject to variable outcomes. Perhaps up to 55-70% of HAIs are potentially preventable. This is subject to a law of diminishing returns as the preventable proportion of HAIs may reduce over time with improvements in patient safety. As the principle tenet of medicine is first do no harm, infection prevention programs should relentlessly pursue reliable, sustainable, and practical strategies for heightened patient safety.
}, year = {2019}, journal = {Curr Infect Dis Rep}, volume = {21}, pages = {2}, month = {02/2019}, issn = {1523-3847}, doi = {10.1007/s11908-019-0660-2}, language = {eng}, }