@article{6989,
  author = {Bruno Petinaux and Rahul Bhat and Keith Boniface and Jaime Aristizabal},
  title = {Accuracy of radiographic readings in the emergency department.},
  abstract = {<p><b>OBJECTIVES: </b>A review of radiology discrepancies of emergency department (ED) radiograph interpretations was undertaken to examine the types of error made by emergency physicians (EPs).</p><p><b>METHODS: </b>An ED quality assurance database containing all radiology discrepancies between the EP and radiology from June 1996 to May 2005 was reviewed. The discrepancies were categorized as bone, chest (CXR), and abdomen (AXR) radiographs and examined to identify abnormalities missed by EPs.</p><p><b>RESULTS: </b>During the study period, the ED ordered approximately 151 693 radiographs. Of the total, 4605 studies were identified by radiology as having a total of 5308 abnormalities discordant from the EP interpretation. Three hundred fifty-nine of these abnormalities were not confirmed by the radiologist (false positive). The remainder of the discordant studies represented abnormalities identified by the radiologist and missed by the EP (false negatives). Of these false-negative studies, 1954 bone radiographs (2.4% of bone x-rays ordered) had missed findings with 2050 abnormalities; the most common missed findings were fractures and dislocations. Of the 220 AXRs (3.7% of AXRs ordered) with missed findings, 240 abnormalities were missed; the most common of these was bowel obstruction. Of the 2431 CXRs (3.8% of CXRs ordered), 2659 abnormalities were missed; the most common were air-space disease and pulmonary nodules. The rate of discrepancies potentially needing emergent change in management based solely on a radiographic discrepancy was 85 of 151 693 x-rays (0.056%).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS: </b>Approximately 3% of radiographs interpreted by EPs are subsequently given a discrepant interpretation by the radiology attending. The most commonly missed findings included fractures, dislocations, air-space disease, and pulmonary nodules. Continuing education should focus on these areas to attempt to further reduce this error rate.</p>},
  year = {2011},
  journal = {Am J Emerg Med},
  volume = {29},
  pages = {18-25},
  month = {01/2011},
  issn = {1532-8171},
  doi = {10.1016/j.ajem.2009.07.011},
  language = {eng},
}