@article{857,
  keywords = {competency, education and training issues, reflections on diagnosis},
  author = {Edna C. Shenvi and Stephanie Feudjio Feupe and Hai Yang and Robert El-Kareh},
  title = {"Closing the loop": a mixed-methods study about resident learning from outcome feedback after patient handoffs.},
  abstract = {<p>Background Learning patient outcomes is recognized as crucial for ongoing refinement of clinical decision-making, but is often difficult in fragmented care with frequent handoffs. Data on resident habits of seeking outcome feedback after handoffs are lacking. Methods We performed a mixed-methods study including (1) an analysis of chart re-access rates after handoffs performed using access logs of the electronic health record (EHR); and (2) a web-based survey sent to internal medicine (IM) and emergency medicine (EM) residents about their habits of and barriers to learning the outcomes of patients after they have handed them off to other teams. Results Residents on ward rotations were often able to re-access charts of patients after handoffs, but those on EM or night admitting rotations did so <5% of the time. Among residents surveyed, only a minority stated that they frequently find out the outcomes of patients they have handed off, although learning outcomes was important to both their education and job satisfaction. Most were not satisfied with current systems of learning outcomes of patients after handoffs, citing too little time and lack of reliable patient tracking systems as the main barriers. Conclusions Despite perceived importance of learning outcomes after handoffs, residents cite difficulty with obtaining such information. Systematically providing feedback on patient outcomes would meet a recognized need among physicians in training.</p>},
  year = {2018},
  journal = {Diagnosis (Berl)},
  volume = {5},
  pages = {235-242},
  month = {12/2018},
  issn = {2194-802X},
  doi = {10.1515/dx-2018-0013},
  language = {eng},
}