U.S. flag

An official website of the Department of Health & Human Services

AHRQ: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Provide Feedback |
Submit a Case
Patient Safety Network
Search Tips

Continuing Education

What is PSNet Continuing Education?

PSNet Continuing Education offerings include WebM&M Spotlight Cases and Commentaries, which are certified for Continuing Medical Education/ Continuing Education Units (CME/CEU) and Maintenance of Certification (MOC) credit through the University of California, Davis (UCD) Health Office of Continuing Medical Education. 
 

Each WebM&M Spotlight Case and Commentary is certified for the AMA PRA Category 1™ and Maintenance of Certification (MOC) through the American Board of Internal Medicine by the Office of Continuing Medical Education (OCME) at UCD, Health. 
 

Learn more about how to earn credit from UCD 

UCD's CME Security and Privacy 

 

How does it work?

Earn CME or MOC credit and trainee certification by successfully completing quizzes based on Cases & Commentaries. 

  • Individuals have two attempts at each quiz to achieve a passing score of 80% or higher in order to earn credit.
  • If you fail a quiz twice, the quiz will become unavailable, but the Spotlight case will be available as read-only.
  • Spotlight Cases older than three years continue to be available as read-only, but their associated quizzes have been disabled.
  • If you have questions specifically regarding University of California San Francisco (UCSF) CME/CEU, including registration, accreditation, or content, please email us at info@ocme.ucsf.edu.

New WebM&M Spotlight Cases

All WebM&M Spotlight Cases (10)
Published Date
PSNet Publication Date
Continue Education
Additional Filters
Approach to Improving Safety
Clinical Area
Error Types
Safety Target
Setting of Care
Target Audience
Why create an account for Continued Education?
Gain access to quizzes and start earning CME, CEU, or Trainee certification.
Start Earning Certifications
Displaying 1 - 10 of 10 WebM&M Spotlight Cases
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
    • "Do You Want Everything Done?": Clarifying Code Status
    Karl Steinberg, MD, CMD, HMDC and Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD | December 18, 2019
    Save to Library
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Copy URL
    • A 63-year-old woman with hematemesis was admitted by a 2nd year medical resident for an endoscopy. The resident did not spend adequate time discussing her code status and subsequently, made a series of errors that failed to honor the patient’s preferences and could have resulted in an adverse outcome for this relatively healthy woman.
    Supervision and Entrustment in Clinical Training: Protecting Patients, Protecting Trainees
    Olle ten Cate, PhD| November 1, 2018
    Save to Library
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Copy URL
    • An ICU patient with head and spine trauma was sent for an MRI. Due his critical condition, hospital policy required a physician and nurse to accompany the patient to the MRI scanner. The ICU attending assigned a new intern, who felt unprepared to handle any crises that might arise, to transport the patient along with the nurse. While in a holding area awaiting the MRI, the patient's heart rate fell below 20 beats per minute, and the experienced ICU nurse administered atropine to recover his heart rate and blood pressure. The intern worried he had placed the patient's life at risk because of his inexperience, but he also felt uncomfortable speaking up.
    Suicidal Ideation in the Family Medicine Clinic
    Christine Moutier, MD| December 1, 2016
    Save to Library
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Copy URL
    • A young woman with a history of suicide attempts called her primary care physician's office in the morning saying that she had been cutting herself and had taken extra doses of medication. The receptionist scheduled the patient for an appointment late that afternoon. After the clinic visit, while awaiting transfer to the emergency department for evaluation and admission, the patient was left unattended and eloped before providers could evaluate her.
    Privacy or Safety?
    John D. Halamka, MD, MS, and Deven McGraw, JD, MPH, LLM| August 21, 2015
    Save to Library
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Copy URL
    • A hospitalized patient with advanced dementia was to undergo a brain MRI as part of a diagnostic workup for altered mental status. Hospital policy dictated that signout documentation include only patients' initials rather than more identifiable information such as full name or birth date. In this case, the patient requiring the brain MRI had the same initials as another patient on the same unit with severe cognitive impairment from a traumatic brain injury. The cross-covering resident mixed up the two patients and placed the MRI order in the wrong chart. Because the order for a "brain MRI to evaluate worsening cognitive function" could apply to either patient, neither the bedside nurse nor radiologist noticed the error.
    It's Sarah, Not Stephen!
    Urmimala Sarkar, MD, MPH| October 1, 2013
    Save to Library
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Copy URL
    • Although the mother of a child, born male who identified as and expressed externally as a girl, had alerted the clinic of the child's preferred name when making the appointment, the medical staff called for the patient in the waiting room using her legal (masculine) name.
    The ECG Is Not Normal
    Abigail Zuger, MD| June 1, 2011
    Save to Library
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Copy URL
    • An adolescent girl passed out after a soccer game, and her father, a physician, took her to the pediatrician for tests. The physician father obtained a copy of his daughter’s ECG, panicked because it was not normal, and began guiding his daughter’s medical care.
    Difficult Encounters: A CMO and CNO Respond
    Ernest J. Ring, MD; Jane E. Hirsch, RN, MS| October 1, 2009
    Save to Library
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Copy URL
    • Cardiology consultation on an elderly man admitted to the orthopedic service following a hip fracture reveals aortic stenosis. The cardiologist recommends against surgery, due to the risk of anesthesia. When the nurse reads these recommendations to the orthopedic resident, he calls her "stupid" and contacts the OR to schedule the surgery anyway. The Chief Medical Officer is called to intervene.
    How Do Providers Recover From Errors?
    Colin P. West, MD, PhD| January 1, 2008
    Save to Library
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Copy URL
    • An elderly man with COPD and end-stage congestive heart failure was admitted for increasing shortness of breath, due to a pleural effusion. A resident performed a thoracentesis on the wrong side, and the patient developed a pneumothorax and died. The resident disclosed the error but was devastated.
    Do Not Disturb!
    F. Daniel Duffy, MD; Christine K. Cassel, MD| October 1, 2007
    Save to Library
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Copy URL
    • Following surgery, a woman on a patient-controlled analgesia pump is found to be lethargic and incoherent, with a low respiratory rate. The nurse contacted the attending physician, who dismisses the patient's symptoms and chastises the nurse for the late call.
    Back To Top
    Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy | External Link Disclaimer | RSS Feed

    Connect With Us

    Facebook Twitter You Tube LinkedIn

    Sign up for Email Updates

    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

    5600 Fishers Lane
    Rockville, MD 20857
    Telephone: (301) 427-1364

    Submit Your Innovations