Skip to main content
Study

The "Big Dog" effect: variability assessing the causes of error in diagnoses of patients with lung cancer.

Raab SS, Meier FA, Zarbo RJ, et al. The "Big Dog" effect: variability assessing the causes of error in diagnoses of patients with lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(18):2808-14.

Save
Print
July 19, 2006
Raab SS, Meier FA, Zarbo RJ, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(18):2808-14.

The AHRQ–funded researchers analyzed false-negative diagnostic results and found poor agreement among pathologists as to the causes of the error. The authors conclude that pathologist reluctance to change or challenge a peer's reading is a contributing factor.

Save
Print
Cite
Citation

Raab SS, Meier FA, Zarbo RJ, et al. The "Big Dog" effect: variability assessing the causes of error in diagnoses of patients with lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(18):2808-14.