Common errors in computer electrocardiogram interpretation.

Maya E. Guglin; Deepak Thatai

Study

Common errors in computer electrocardiogram interpretation.

January 25, 2006

Guglin ME, Thatai D. Int J Cardiol. 2006;106(2):232-7.

View more articles from the same authors.

The investigators studied errors in electrocardiogram reading and found that computerized diagnostic interpretations of life-threatening conditions were often inaccurate.

PubMed citation

Available at

Related Resources From the Same Author(s)

Comparative evaluation of LLMs in clinical oncology.

May 8, 2024

Declines in hospitalizations for acute cardiovascular conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multicenter tertiary care experience.

July 1, 2020

Association of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program implementation with readmission and mortality outcomes in heart failure.

November 22, 2017

Increased mortality associated with after-hours and weekend admission to the intensive care unit: a retrospective analysis.

April 20, 2011

Emergency medicine physicians' perspectives on diagnostic accuracy in neurology: a qualitative study.

July 6, 2022

Use of design thinking and human factors approach to improve situation awareness in the pediatric intensive care unit.

November 1, 2023

Improving shared situation awareness for high-risk therapies in hospitalized children.

January 19, 2022

Toward zero harm: Mackenzie Health's journey toward becoming a high reliability organization and eliminating avoidable harm.

November 16, 2022

Toward safer opioid prescribing in HIV care (TOWER): a mixed-methods, cluster-randomized trial.

June 22, 2022

Impact of a relocation to a new critical care building on pediatric safety events.

April 3, 2024

Related Resources

Radiologist errors by modality, anatomic region, and pathology for 1.6 million exams: what we have learned.

March 2, 2022

Stand-alone artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in mammography: comparison with 101 radiologists.

March 27, 2019

Radiologic errors and malpractice: a blurry distinction.

October 3, 2007

Why Current Breast Pathology Practices Must Be Evaluated.

January 24, 2007

Implications of the failure to identify high-risk electrocardiogram findings for the quality of care of patients with acute myocardial infarction: results of the Emergency Department Quality in Myocardial Infarction (EDQMI) study.

November 8, 2006

Identification errors involving clinical laboratories: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of patient and specimen identification errors at 120 institutions.

August 16, 2006

The "Big Dog" effect: variability assessing the causes of error in diagnoses of patients with lung cancer.

July 19, 2006

CT for suspected appendicitis in children: an analysis of diagnostic errors.

March 1, 2006

Clinical impact and frequency of anatomic pathology errors in cancer diagnoses.

October 26, 2005

WebM&M Cases

Diagnosing Diagnostic Mistakes

May 1, 2005

See More About The Topic

Physicians

Risk Managers

Radiology

Diagnostic Test Interpretation Error

Error Analysis

Common errors in computer electrocardiogram interpretation.

Connect With Us

Sign up for Email Updates

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Common errors in computer electrocardiogram interpretation.

Connect With Us

Sign up for Email Updates

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Submit Your Innovations

Continue as a Guest

Continue Logged In

Submit Your Innovations

Continue as a Guest

Continue logged in

New Users to the PSNet site

Submit Your Training

Continue as a Guest

Continue Logged In

Submit Your Training

Continue as a Guest

Continue Logged In

New Users to the PSNet site

Submit Your Toolkit

Continue as a Guest

Continue Logged In

Submit Your Toolkit

Continue as a Guest

Continue Logged In

New Users to the PSNet site

Submit Your WebM&M Case

Continue as a Guest

Continue Logged In

Submit Your WebM&M Case

Continue as a Guest

Already have a PSNet

Account?

New Users