Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Study

Deficiencies in provider-reported interpreter use in a clinical trial comparing telephonic and video interpretation in a pediatric emergency department.

Gutman CK, Klein EJ, Follmer K, et al. Deficiencies in provider-reported interpreter use in a clinical trial comparing telephonic and video interpretation in a pediatric emergency department. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020;46(10):573-580. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.08.001

Save
Print
October 14, 2020
Gutman CK, Klein EJ, Follmer K, et al. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020;46(10):573-580.
View more articles from the same authors.

Use of professional interpreters can reduce language barriers contributing to safety risks, particularly in vulnerable  pediatric populations. This survey of pediatric emergency providers found that despite caring for patients enrolled in a study of professional interpreter modalities, many respondents reported lapses in professional interpretation and commonly reported less frequent and deferred communication due to the need for interpretation.

Save
Print
Cite
Citation

Gutman CK, Klein EJ, Follmer K, et al. Deficiencies in provider-reported interpreter use in a clinical trial comparing telephonic and video interpretation in a pediatric emergency department. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020;46(10):573-580. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.08.001

Related Resources From the Same Author(s)
Related Resources