Skip to main content
Commentary

Expert consensus on currently accepted measures of harm.

Logan MS, Myers LC, Salmasian H, et al. Expert consensus on currently accepted measures of harm. J Patient Saf. Epub 2020 Aug 10. doi: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000754.

Save
Print
September 9, 2020
Logan MS, Myers LC, Salmasian H, et al. J Patient Saf. 2021;17(8):e1726-e1731.

This article describes an innovative expert consensus process to generate a contemporary list of chart-review based triggers and adverse event measures for assessing the incidence of inpatient and outpatient adverse events. A panel of 71 experts from nine institutions identified 218 triggers and measures with high or very high clinical importance deemed suitable for chart review and 198 were found suitable for electronic surveillance; 192 items were suitable for both.   

Save
Print
Cite
Citation

Logan MS, Myers LC, Salmasian H, et al. Expert consensus on currently accepted measures of harm. J Patient Saf. Epub 2020 Aug 10. doi: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000754.

Related Resources