Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Commentary

Facing ambiguous threats.

Roberto MA, Bohmer RMJ, Edmondson A. Facing ambiguous threats. Harv Bus Rev. 2006;84(11):106-13, 157.

Save
Print
December 13, 2006
Roberto MA, Bohmer RMJ, Edmondson A. Harv Bus Rev. 2006;84(11):106-13, 157.
View more articles from the same authors.

This study describes how organizations respond to signs that may or may not portend future catastrophes. The authors examine the space shuttle Columbia disaster in depth, with particular attention to the group dynamics and organizational cultural barriers that combined to produce an ineffective response to the "ambiguous threat" posed by the foam damage to the shuttle's wing. Examples from health care, such as the deployment of rapid response teams, are used to illustrate how recognizing early signals, practicing teamwork, and encouraging experimentation can prevent ambiguous threats from developing into substantive threats. Bohmer and Edmondson have previously described the collective learning process that health care organizations should strive to achieve.

Save
Print
Cite
Citation

Roberto MA, Bohmer RMJ, Edmondson A. Facing ambiguous threats. Harv Bus Rev. 2006;84(11):106-13, 157.

Related Resources From the Same Author(s)
Related Resources