Skip to main content
Review

Integrating computerized clinical decision support systems into clinical work: a meta-synthesis of qualitative research.

Miller A, Moon B, Anders S, et al. Integrating computerized clinical decision support systems into clinical work: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Int J Med Inform. 2015;84(12):1009-18. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.09.005.

Save

Print

November 4, 2015
Miller A, Moon B, Anders S, et al. Int J Med Inform. 2015;84:1009-18.

Prior research on whether clinical decision support systems (CDSS) improve patient outcomes has given mixed results. This meta-analysis interpreted qualitative CDSS studies to better understand why these varied results may occur. The authors conclude that knowledge about how to best integrate these systems is largely lacking and further research is needed to address usability, design, and integration of CDSS.

Save

Print

Cite
Citation

Miller A, Moon B, Anders S, et al. Integrating computerized clinical decision support systems into clinical work: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Int J Med Inform. 2015;84(12):1009-18. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.09.005.