Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Review
Classic

Interruptions and distractions in healthcare: review and reappraisal.

Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Karsh B-T. Interruptions and distractions in healthcare: review and reappraisal. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(4):304-312. doi:10.1136/qshc.2009.033282.

Save
Print
September 24, 2016
Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Karsh B-T. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(4):304-312.
View more articles from the same authors.

The majority of individual errors are due to failure to perform automatic or reflexive actions. A major risk factor for these "slips" is being interrupted or distracted while performing a task. This review examined the literature on the incidence, risk factors, and effects of interruptions in several clinical settings, ranging from outpatient clinics to the operating room. Although distractions are common and may be associated with increased risk for error, particularly if they occur during medication administration or signout, the authors point out that many interruptions may be necessary to communicate urgent clinical information. They argue for complexity theory–based research to delineate the harmful and beneficial aspects of interruptions, rather than for interventions that seek to simply eliminate interruptions. Checklists have been widely adopted as a means of preventing errors of omission, which may be precipitated by interruptions.

Save
Print
Cite
Citation

Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Karsh B-T. Interruptions and distractions in healthcare: review and reappraisal. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(4):304-312. doi:10.1136/qshc.2009.033282.