Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Commentary

Measuring and improving diagnostic safety in primary care: addressing the “twin” pandemics of diagnostic error and clinician burnout.

Olson APJ, Linzer M, Schiff GD. Measuring and Improving Diagnostic Safety in Primary Care: Addressing the “Twin” Pandemics of Diagnostic Error and Clinician Burnout. J Gen Intern Care. 2021;36(5):1404-1406. doi:10.1007/s11606-021-06611-0.

Save
Print Download PDF
March 3, 2021
Olson APJ, Linzer M, Schiff GD. J Gen Intern Care. 2021;36(5):1404-1406.
View more articles from the same authors.

Challenges to identifying and measuring diagnostic errors, particularly in the era of COVID-19, persist. The authors of this perspective proposed a new framework of diagnostic process safety to measure the quality and safety of diagnostic processes. The framework focuses on three measurable components – do not miss diagnoses, red flags, and diagnostic pitfalls. This framework can provide a structured approach for designing and testing specific measures of diagnostic process safety.

Save
Print Download PDF
Cite
Citation

Olson APJ, Linzer M, Schiff GD. Measuring and Improving Diagnostic Safety in Primary Care: Addressing the “Twin” Pandemics of Diagnostic Error and Clinician Burnout. J Gen Intern Care. 2021;36(5):1404-1406. doi:10.1007/s11606-021-06611-0.