Skip to main content
Commentary

Measuring preventable harm: helping science keep pace with policy.  

Pronovost PJ, Colantuoni E. Measuring preventable harm: helping science keep pace with policy. JAMA. 2009;301(12):1273-5. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.388.

Save

Print

April 1, 2009
Pronovost PJ, Colantuoni E. JAMA. 2009;301:1273-5.

This commentary discusses the shortcomings in policy measures to improve patient safety. To a large extent, policy measures are limited by an inability to distinguish between "inevitable" and "preventable" harm, and current policies (such as the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services' [CMS] no pay for errors policy) assume that certain harms are entirely preventable. While this may be appropriate for certain adverse events, the authors argue that research should focus on the basic science of patient safety—determining which types of errors are truly preventable and developing error measurement methods that are reliable, scalable, and useful for comparing hospitals. Policy measures should be informed by this research, so that payment policies appropriately incentivize organizations to eliminate preventable harm. The merits of the CMS error payment policy were discussed in a prior editorial.

Save

Print

Cite
Citation

Pronovost PJ, Colantuoni E. Measuring preventable harm: helping science keep pace with policy. JAMA. 2009;301(12):1273-5. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.388.