Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Study

Quality of traditional surveillance for public reporting of nosocomial bloodstream infection rates.

Lin MY, Hota B, Khan YM, et al. Quality of traditional surveillance for public reporting of nosocomial bloodstream infection rates. JAMA. 2010;304(18):2035-41. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1637.

Save
Print
November 17, 2010
Lin MY, Hota B, Khan YM, et al. JAMA. 2010;304(18):2035-41.
View more articles from the same authors.

Prevention of central line–associated bloodstream infections represents one of the patient safety movement's leading success stories. However, this study raises the concern that the accuracy of traditional methods for detecting these infections may vary considerably between hospitals.

Save
Print
Cite
Citation

Lin MY, Hota B, Khan YM, et al. Quality of traditional surveillance for public reporting of nosocomial bloodstream infection rates. JAMA. 2010;304(18):2035-41. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1637.