Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Study

Surgical patient safety outcomes in critical access hospitals: how do they compare?

Natafgi N, Baloh J, Weigel P, et al. Surgical Patient Safety Outcomes in Critical Access Hospitals: How Do They Compare? The Journal of Rural Health. 2016;33(2). doi:10.1111/jrh.12176.

Save
Print
April 6, 2016
Natafgi N, Baloh J, Weigel P, et al. The Journal of Rural Health. 2016;33(2).
View more articles from the same authors.

Critical access hospitals are located in rural areas, at least 35 miles from any other hospital. Prior studies found these hospitals may have worse outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, or pneumonia, compared with other acute care hospitals. Using data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project and American Hospital Association, this study examined surgical outcomes from 136 nonfederal general hospitals with fewer than 50 beds. Following adjustments for patient mix, hospital characteristics, and number of discharges, investigators found no differences in surgical patient safety indicators between critical access rural hospitals and comparably sized prospective payment hospitals. This finding demonstrates the importance of quality surgical care in rural hospitals. An AHRQ-funded toolkit provides resources for small rural hospitals interested in implementing safety measures.

Save
Print
Cite
Citation

Natafgi N, Baloh J, Weigel P, et al. Surgical Patient Safety Outcomes in Critical Access Hospitals: How Do They Compare? The Journal of Rural Health. 2016;33(2). doi:10.1111/jrh.12176.

Related Resources From the Same Author(s)
Related Resources