Skip to main content
Commentary

Toward improving patient safety through voluntary peer-to-peer assessment.

Hudson DW, Holzmueller CG, Pronovost PJ, et al. Toward improving patient safety through voluntary peer-to-peer assessment. Am J Med Qual. 2012;27(3):201-9. doi:10.1177/1062860611421981.

Save
Print
January 25, 2012
Hudson DW, Holzmueller CG, Pronovost PJ, et al. Am J Med Qual. 2012;27(3):201-9.

To detect and analyze errors, health care has traditionally relied on retrospective methods such as incident reporting and root cause analysis. This commentary draws a contrast between this approach and that used in the nuclear power industry, which focuses on prospective error detection through the use of a robust peer-to-peer assessment process. Nuclear power facilities can request peer review by an independent non-regulatory body, which conducts a detailed safety assessment and makes specific recommendations for safety improvement. The authors recommend developing a similar process for hospitals and discuss barriers that would need to be overcome in order to implement such a process.

Save
Print
Cite
Citation

Hudson DW, Holzmueller CG, Pronovost PJ, et al. Toward improving patient safety through voluntary peer-to-peer assessment. Am J Med Qual. 2012;27(3):201-9. doi:10.1177/1062860611421981.