Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Review

Variation in detected adverse events using trigger tools: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eggenschwiler LC, Rutjes AWS, Musy SN, et al. Variation in detected adverse events using trigger tools: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(9):e0273800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273800

Save
Print
September 21, 2022
Eggenschwiler LC, Rutjes AWS, Musy SN, et al. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(9):e0273800.
View more articles from the same authors.

Trigger tools alert patient safety personnel to potential adverse events (AE) which can then be followed up with retrospective chart review. This review sought to understand the variability in adverse event detection in acute care and study characteristics that may explain the variation. Fifty-four studies were included with a wide range of AEs detected per 100 admissions. The authors suggest developing guidelines for studies reporting on AEs identified using trigger tools to decrease study heterogeneity.

Save
Print
Cite
Citation

Eggenschwiler LC, Rutjes AWS, Musy SN, et al. Variation in detected adverse events using trigger tools: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(9):e0273800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273800

Related Resources From the Same Author(s)
Related Resources