Skip to main content
Study

Variations in GPs' decisions to investigate suspected lung cancer: a factorial experiment using multimedia vignettes.

Sheringham J, Sequeira R, Myles J, et al. Variations in GPs' decisions to investigate suspected lung cancer: a factorial experiment using multimedia vignettes. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26(6):449-459. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005679.

Save

Print

October 19, 2016
Sheringham J, Sequeira R, Myles J, et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26:449-459.

Diagnostic error is common in the primary care setting, with a recent study estimating that 5% of adults in the United States experience a diagnostic error each year. Missed and delayed diagnoses of cancer are a major source of diagnostic error in primary care and account for a large proportion of malpractice lawsuits. This study used detailed, video-based clinical vignettes to analyze how primary care physicians in the United Kingdom chose to initiate the diagnostic workup for lung cancer in patients presenting with a variety of symptoms. The investigators found that clinicians did not consistently pursue further testing in patients with high-risk symptoms, particularly when they failed to elicit additional information from the patient. A recent study found that electronic triggers increased the rate of appropriate workup in patients with suspected cancer, indicating the potential for decision support systems to reduce diagnostic error.

Save

Print

Cite
Citation

Sheringham J, Sequeira R, Myles J, et al. Variations in GPs' decisions to investigate suspected lung cancer: a factorial experiment using multimedia vignettes. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26(6):449-459. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005679.