Perspectives on Safety
Narrow Results Clear All
Trigger Tools, May 2012
One of the pioneers of the trigger tool methodology for detecting adverse events, Dr. Classen is Chief Medical information Officer at Pascal Metrics and Associate Professor of Medicine at the University of Utah.
with commentary by Paul J. Sharek, MD, MPH, Trigger Tools, May 2012
This piece explains how the trigger tool approach identifies adverse events more efficiently than other detection methods such as voluntary incident reporting and patient safety indicators drawn from administrative data.
with commentary by Jeffrey M. Rothschild, MD, MPH; Carol Keohane, RN, BSN, Bar Coding for Medication Safety, September 2008
Medication safety in hospitals depends on the successful execution of a complex system of scores of individual tasks that can be categorized into five stages: ordering or prescribing, preparing, dispensing, transcribing, and monitoring the patient's response. Many of these tasks lend themselves to technologic tools. Over the past 20 years, technology has played an increasingly larger role toward achieving the five rights of medication safety: getting the right dose of the right drug to the right patient using the right route and at the right time. While several of these technologies may incur significant upfront and maintenance costs, the net impact over time may be reduced overall institutional costs and improvements in work efficiency. Examples of technologic tools commonly seen in many hospitals today include computerized provider order entry (CPOE) with decision support and automatic dispensing carts, also known as medication dispensing robots. While outside the scope of this Perspective, it is important to emphasize that many nontechnologic interventions, such as clinical pharmacists on physician rounds, can be equally effective in improving medication safety.