Perspectives on Safety
Narrow Results Clear All
- Communication Improvement 2
- Education and Training
- Error Reporting and Analysis 3
- Legal and Policy Approaches 1
- Logistical Approaches 1
- Quality Improvement Strategies 1
- Teamwork 1
- Technologic Approaches 2
Improving Diagnosis, July 2018
Dr. Nundy is the Director of the Human Diagnosis Project, a nonprofit organization taking a unique crowdsourcing approach to improving medical diagnosis. He also practices primary care at a federally qualified health center for low-income and uninsured individuals in Washington, DC. We spoke with him about his work with the Human Diagnosis Project.
with commentary by Zahra Khudeira, PharmD, Certification in Patient Safety, June 2016
In this piece, a pharmacist highlights the importance of earning patient safety certification.
Update on Diagnostic Errors, January 2016
Dr. Graber founded the Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine and the journal, Diagnosis. We spoke with him about the recent National Academy of Medicine (formerly Institute of Medicine) Improving Diagnosis in Health Care report, and about diagnostic errors more generally.
with commentary by Hardeep Singh, MD, MPH, Update on Diagnostic Errors, January 2016
This piece discusses momentum in the field of diagnostic error over the past several years (culminating in the recent Improving Diagnosis in Health Care report) and outlines future avenues to ensure progress in diagnostic safety.
with commentary by P. Jeffrey Brady, MD, MPH; William B. Munier, MD, MBA; Irim Azam, MPH, Patient Safety Research, December 2013
This piece, written by three leaders in AHRQ's research portfolio, covers future avenues for patient safety research and reviews current AHRQ projects.
The Demise of the Physical Exam, November 2012
A passionate advocate for the importance of the physical exam, Dr. Verghese is a Professor at Stanford University School of Medicine and a bestselling author.
with commentary by David P. Sklar, MD; Cameron Crandall, MD, Patient Safety in Emergency Medicine, June 2010
Emergency medicine has evolved from a location, with variably trained and experienced providers ("the ER"), to a discipline with a well-defined knowledge base and skill set that focus on the diagnosis and care of undifferentiated acute problems.(1) The importance of rapid diagnosis and treatment of serious conditions (e.g., myocardial infarction, stroke, trauma, and sepsis) has made timeliness not simply a determinant of patient satisfaction but also a significant safety and quality concern—delays in care can be deadly.(2) Emergency physicians (EPs) have identified delays caused by crowding from boarding of admitted patients as their most significant safety problem.(3) We present a model for understanding emergency department (ED) patient safety and identify solutions by deconstructing care into three realms: individual provider, patient, and environmental system (Table).