Skip to main content

The PSNet Collection: All Content

The AHRQ PSNet Collection comprises an extensive selection of resources relevant to the patient safety community. These resources come in a variety of formats, including literature, research, tools, and Web sites. Resources are identified using the National Library of Medicine’s Medline database, various news and content aggregators, and the expertise of the AHRQ PSNet editorial and technical teams.

Search All Content

Search Tips
Selection
Format
Download
Filter By Author(s)
Advanced Filtering Mode
Date Ranges
Published Date
Original Publication Date
Original Publication Date
PSNet Publication Date
Additional Filters
Approach to Improving Safety
Selection
Format
Download
Displaying 1 - 20 of 25 Results
Huth K, Hotz A, Emara N, et al. J Patient Saf. 2023;19:493-500.
The transition from hospital to home is a vulnerable time as patients may have changes in medications or care needs, or difficulties accessing follow up with an outpatient provider. To reduce adverse events (AE), rehospitalizations, and emergency department visits, this hospital developed a structured discharge bundle based on the I-PASS tool used for inpatient handoffs. AE, rehospitalizations, and emergency department visits were all reduced following implementation of the I-PASS bundle.
Ryan SL, Logan M, Liu X, et al. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2023;19:689-697.
I-PASS is a structured tool to improve handoffs and communication between clinicians and promote patient safety. This study examined I-PASS implementation practices over a six-year period in 10 departments at one large academic medical center. Researchers found that most clinical services successfully implemented I-PASS and those using I-PASS conducted the most efficient handovers.
Bates DW, Levine DM, Salmasian H, et al. New Engl J Med. 2023;388:142-153.
An accurate understanding of the frequency, severity, and preventability of adverse events is required to effectively improve patient safety. This study included review of more than 2,800 inpatient records from 11 American hospitals with nearly one quarter having at least one preventable or not preventable adverse event. Overall, approximately 7% of all admissions included at least one preventable event and 1% had a severity level of serious or higher. An accompanying editorial by Dr. Donald Berwick sees the results of this study as a needed stimulus for leadership to prioritize patient safety anew.
Stenquist DS, Yeung CM, Szapary HJ, et al. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2022;6:e22.00079.
The I-PASS structured handoff tool has been widely implemented to improve communication during handoffs and patient transfers. In this study, researchers modified the I-PASS tool for use in orthopedic surgery and assessed the impact on adverse clinical outcomes. After 18 months, there was sustained adherence to the tool and the quality of handoffs improved, but no notable changes in clinical outcomes were identified.
Phadke NA, Wickner PG, Wang L, et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022;10:1844-1855.e3.
Patient exposure to allergens healthcare settings, such as latex or certain medications, can lead to adverse outcomes. Based on data from an incident reporting system, researchers in this study developed a system for classifying allergy-related safety events. Classification categories include: (1) incomplete or inaccurate EHR documentation, (2) human factors, such as overridden allergy alerts, (3) alert limitation or malfunction, (4) data exchange and interoperability failures, and (5) issues with EHR system default options. This classification system can be used to support improvements at the individual, team, and systems levels. 
Kuznetsova M, Frits ML, Dulgarian S, et al. JAMIA Open. 2021;4:ooab096.
Dashboards can be used to synthesize data and visualize patient safety indicators and metrics to facilitate decision-making. The authors reviewed design features of patient safety dashboards from 10 hospitals and discuss the variation in the use of performance indicators, style, and timeframe for displayed metrics. The authors suggest that future research explore how specific design elements contribute to usability, and which approaches are associated with improved outcomes.
Myers LC, Blumenthal K, Phadke NA, et al. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2021;47:54-59.
Learning from adverse events is a core component of patient safety improvement. These authors developed guidance for the use of peer review protected information (such as voluntary event reports and root causes analyses) in safety research. The guidance aims to ensure that data are handled safely and appropriately while supporting scientific discovery.  
Logan MS, Myers LC, Salmasian H, et al. J Patient Saf. 2021;17:e1726-e1731.
This article describes an innovative expert consensus process to generate a contemporary list of chart-review based triggers and adverse event measures for assessing the incidence of inpatient and outpatient adverse events. A panel of 71 experts from nine institutions identified 218 triggers and measures with high or very high clinical importance deemed suitable for chart review and 198 were found suitable for electronic surveillance; 192 items were suitable for both.   
Myers LC, Gartland RM, Skillings J, et al. Acad Med. 2020;95:1215-1222.
This case-control study using medical malpractice claims identified patient-, provider-, and claim-related factors in claims directly involving physician trainees in the events. The majority of claims were procedure-related and the most common diagnosis in claims cases was puncture or laceration during surgery. Inadequate supervision was a common contributing factor.
Gartland RM, Myers LC, Iorgulescu JB, et al. J Patient Saf. 2020;17:576-582.
This study reviewed medical malpractice claims spanning a 10-year period involving deaths related to inpatient care. Two physicians completed a blinded review of the claim to determine whether there was major, minor or no discordance between the final clinical diagnoses and the pathological diagnoses ascertained at autopsy. The researchers found that 31% of claims demonstrated major discordance between autopsy and clinical findings. The most common diagnoses newly discovered on autopsy were infection or sepsis, pulmonary or air embolus, and coronary atherosclerosis. In addition, the researchers found that performing an autopsy was not associated with either the likelihood of payout on a malpractice or the median size of that payout. They conclude that physicians should not hesitate to advocate for autopsies to investigate unexpected in-hospital deaths.
El Hechi MW, Bohnen JD, Westfal M, et al. J Am Coll Surg. 2019;230:926-933.
This paper describes the implementation of a "second victim" peer-support program in the surgery department at a tertiary care center. The program trained surgical attendings and trainees to provide peer-support for other surgeons involved in major adverse events. After one-year follow-up, 81% of affected surgeons elected to receive peer support. The majority (81%) felt the program had a positive impact on safety culture by providing a confidential, safe, and timely intervention for so-called "second victims". A 2011 Perspective on Safety with Dr. Albert Wu discussed ways that organizations can support "second victims."
Gartland RM, Alves K, Brasil NC, et al. Am J Surg. 2019;218:181-191.
This systematic review of the safety of overlapping surgery included 14 studies and did not find differences in 30-day mortality or overall morbidity in overlapping versus nonoverlapping surgery across a range of procedures. Researchers noted a small increase in length of procedure for overlapping surgeries. They conclude that overlapping surgery does not lead to higher risk for morbidity and mortality, despite the controversy associated with this practice.
Shahian DM, Liu X, Rossi LP, et al. Health Serv Res. 2018;53:608-631.
Measuring safety culture is viewed as a best practice and is endorsed by the Leapfrog Group and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). However, studies have not consistently demonstrated a direct relationship between safety culture and improved patient outcomes. In this observational cohort study, researchers analyzed data from 19,357 discharges for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) across 171 hospitals and associated data from AHRQ Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture surveys between 2008 and 2013. They found no association between 30-day AMI mortality and safety culture scores. A recent PSNet interview with Mary Dixon-Woods discussed the evolving concept of safety culture.
Shahian DM, McEachern K, Rossi L, et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26:760-770.
Handoffs among providers remain suboptimal despite the development of effective strategies to improve them. This quality improvement report described the implementation of I-PASS, an evidence-based handoff strategy that has shown to reduce adverse events, at an academic medical center. Investigators utilized a comprehensive implementation strategy that included leadership support, training of all staff, integrating electronic health record templates to facilitate performance of I-PASS, and engaging frontline staff. This multi-faceted approach is similar to prior work implementing patient safety strategies. To evaluate the intervention, the researchers conducted surveys of clinicians and observed handoffs to determine if I-PASS was actually in use. They found that I-PASS was more consistently used on medical and pediatric services than on surgical services, where it was felt to be less applicable to stable postsurgical patients. The prevalence of asynchronous handoffs posed a barrier to consistent implementation. This report demonstrates the complexity of implementing and evaluating an evidence-based safety intervention and underscores the need for frontline staff involvement in improving safety.
Mort E, Bruckel J, Donelan K, et al. Am J Med Qual. 2017;32:472-479.
Patient safety approaches often draw from high reliability industries outside of health care. This implementation study described a peer-to-peer assessment program adapted from the nuclear power industry. Two academic medical centers assessed each other's patient safety performance. Each center examined its peer's prevention of central line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI), hand hygiene compliance, and overall safety culture as an organization. Peer-to-peer assessments were conducted via site visits, which involved interviews and direct observation. They resulted in rapid practice changes such as dissemination of unit-specific CLABSI rates and central line procedure audits. The process was widely accepted by leaders and frontline staff at both sites. The authors contend that peer-to-peer assessment is feasible and has potential to improve patient safety.
Lennes IT, Bohlen N, Park ER, et al. J Oncol Pract. 2016;12:e495-501.
Chemotherapy is a complicated process, and it is vulnerable to error due to factors that can affect the various steps involved. This commentary describes how one multidisciplinary cancer center designed and applied a taxonomy to report and monitor chemotherapy errors. The authors summarize the results of the work and provide suggestions for organizations that seek to develop similar tracking and analysis methods.