Skip to main content

The PSNet Collection: All Content

The AHRQ PSNet Collection comprises an extensive selection of resources relevant to the patient safety community. These resources come in a variety of formats, including literature, research, tools, and Web sites. Resources are identified using the National Library of Medicine’s Medline database, various news and content aggregators, and the expertise of the AHRQ PSNet editorial and technical teams.

Search All Content

Search Tips
Selection
Format
Download
Filter By Author(s)
Advanced Filtering Mode
Date Ranges
Published Date
Original Publication Date
Original Publication Date
PSNet Publication Date
Additional Filters
Selection
Format
Download
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 Results
Yudkowsky R, Tumuluru S, Casey P, et al. Simul Healthc. 2014;9:277-82.
Resident preparedness to provide safe care without supervision has been found to be inconsistent across health care. This commentary explains how written tests can fail to uncover these gaps in competency and suggests that current checklists for basic procedural skills are insufficient for assessing performance. The authors recommend an itemized assessment tool with a sharper focus on competency and review their experience with implementing one.
Schwartz A, Weiner SJ, Weaver FM, et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21:918-24.
Failure to appreciate the role of contextual factors—such as patients' access to care or social support—can result in diagnostic errors. In this analysis of data from a prior study, failure to appropriately individualize care based on contextual factors led to substantial excess costs, often due to prescribing unnecessary medications. The investigators also make the important point that most of these errors would not have been detected by standard quality measures for outpatient care.
Weiner SJ, Schwartz A, Weaver FM, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153:69-75.
The landmark Institute of Medicine report on patient safety categorized inappropriate plans of care as a medical error. This broad classification encompassed decision-making errors by clinicians that included diagnostic errors but also the notion of contextual errors. The latter are those that occur because of inattention to patient context such as environment, behavior, economic situation, or access to care and social support. This study used unannounced standardized patients who acted out four clinical scenarios presenting with biomedical and contextual complicating factors. Attending physicians probed fewer contextual red flags than biomedical ones and provided error-free plans of care in 73% of the uncomplicated encounters, 22% of the contextually complicated encounters, and only 9% of the combined biomedically and contextually complicated encounters. The authors advocate for greater attention and performance metrics to assess how well providers deliver individualized patient care plans based on probed contextual factors.