Patient safety is a global health concern. For this study, representatives from 27 countries reported on rules, laws, and policies in their country related to adverse events and medical errors. As expected, laws varied widely between countries regarding issues such as apology laws, patient compensation schemes, and legal and emotional support for clinicians involved in adverse events.

Researchers describe two types of decision making in medicine - fast (intuitive) and slow (analytical). While both types are subject to bias, this paper describes how cognitive biases in fast thinking, such as anchoring or framing, as well as racial or moral bias, can result in obstetrical misdiagnosis. Ten steps to mitigate these cognitive biases are laid out.

Patient and family complaints often highlight concerns missed by standard organization incident reporting. This metasynthesis identified four overarching themes: (1) problems with access to health care services; (2) failure to acquire information about diagnosis, treatment, and the expected patient role; (3) experiencing inappropriate care and bad treatment; (4) problems with trusting health care service providers. The breadth of settings, disciplines, and study populations suggests patient complaints can be a useful tool for improving physical and psychological safety for patients.

STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons’ Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment) criteria are used to identify potentially inappropriate prescribing in older adults. This article describes the consensus process to update and validate the third version of the STOPP/START criteria using evidence from a systematic review and input from a panel with expertise in geriatric pharmacology. The consensus process resulted in additional STOPP criteria (133 versus 80 in version 2) and START criteria (57 versus 34 in version 2). The additional criteria in version 3 can help clinicians detect and prevent adverse drug-drug and drug-disease interactions.

Several systemic factors may hinder communication of test results to patients and clinicians. This article describes a research project in Australia, "Delivering safe and effective test result communication, management and follow-up." Along with previously identified test result communication challenges such as workflow and technology, this paper highlights the need for national thresholds for critical laboratory results.

Ensuring the safety of clinical trial participants is paramount to successful, meaningful clinical research. In this study, researchers examined 585 clinical trial documents and found that 17% included potential patient safety interventions (e.g., resolving medication dosing discrepancies). The authors suggest that clinical specialists’ review of study protocol documents could enhance patient safety during clinical trial conduct.

Like many clinical areas, a variety of system factors can influence diagnostic error rates in neuroradiology. This study included 564 neuroradiologic examinations with diagnostic error and 1,019 without error. Diagnostic errors were associated with longer interpretation times, higher shift volume, and weekend interpretation.

Clinicians and staff are encouraged to speak up about safety concerns as a part of patient safety culture. This review had two aims: to review the literature on speaking up for patient safety, and to develop a single definition of "speaking up" in healthcare. 294 articles were identified with 51 directly focused on speaking up and the remaining on other aspects such as communication. 11 distinct definitions were identified from which the authors developed a single definition: a healthcare professional identifying a concern that might impact patient safety and using his or her voice to raise the concern to someone with the power to address it.

The threat of cybersecurity risks to patient safety is receiving increasing attention. This article describes the development of a new standard to support cyber resiliency in Canada’s healthcare system. The guidance addresses key areas of concern (e.g., organizational risk management, technology considerations, contingency planning), provides suggested roles and responsibilities for an organizational cybersecurity team, and emphasizes the importance of cyber incident response planning.

Patient and family engagement is essential to effective and safe diagnosis. OurDX is a previsit online engagement tool to help identify opportunities to improve diagnostic safety in patients and families living with chronic conditions. In this study, researchers implemented OurDX in specialty and primary care clinics at two academic healthcare organizations and examined the potential safety issues and whether patient/family contributions were integrated into the post-visit notes. Qualitative analysis of 450 OurDX reports found that participants contributed important information about the diagnostic process. Participants with diagnostic concerns were more likely to raise concerns about the diagnostic process (e.g., access barriers, problems with tests/referrals, communication breakdowns), which may represent diagnostic blind spots.

Numerous factors can hinder safe radiology practices, such as communication failures and image interpretation errors. Based on semi-structured interviews with 17 radiologists in Sweden, this study identified 20 themes at the individual-, organization-, technology-, task-and environment-levels describing factors supporting patient safety in radiology. Factors described by participants included the use of standardized tools and work routines (e.g., checklists), handoffs, and incident reporting systems.

Interest in testing ChatGPT as a clinical tool is increasing. This study asked ChatGPT to provide a differential diagnosis, diagnostic testing, final diagnosis, and care management for 36 previously published clinical vignettes. ChatGPT had an overall accuracy of 72%, with the highest level of accuracy at the final diagnosis stage (77%).