Delays in raising concerns in acute or emergency care can have tragic consequences. This commentary uses a case study to highlight barriers to speaking up and evidence-based tools nurses can use such as the CUS Tool and two-challenge rule. Training all healthcare staff in communication techniques can encourage speaking up and respectful responses.

Hierarchy and expected response may inhibit someone from speaking up about a safety concern. This study used two vignettes of a speaking up situation with randomization on speaker seniority, discipline (i.e., allied staff, nurse, physician), tone (i.e., accommodating or non-accommodating), and the presence of other people in the room. All participants were more likely to respond positively to the accommodating tone, but the impact of seniority varied by receiver's discipline.

Unprofessional behavior can have a detrimental effect on coworkers, culture, and patient safety. This qualitative study presents perspectives of middle managers in hospitals that implemented a program allowing and encouraging workers to report unprofessional, as well as positive, behavior. Themes included staying silent but active (e.g., avoiding the unprofessional colleague), history and hierarchy, and double-edged swords (e.g., pros and cons of anonymous reporting).

Organizational incident reporting allows for investigation of contributing factors and formation of improvement recommendations, but some recommendations are weak (e.g., staff training) and do not result in system change. This review found 4,579 recommendations from 11 studies, with less than 7% classified as "strong". There was little explanation for how the recommendations were generated or if they resulted in improvements in safety or quality of care. The authors contend additional research into how recommendations are generated and if they result in sustained improvement is needed.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a useful tool to support radiologists in diagnostic imaging. In this study, discordant findings between the radiologist and AI (negative by radiologist report, positive by AI report, with unviewed AI decision support system output) triggered an automatic manual review of the diagnostic images. More than 111,000 CT studies were analyzed, with 46 triggering the automatic review; of those, 26 (0.02%) were true positives (i.e., missed diagnosis by radiologist but identified by AI).

Effective implementation of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist remains challenging. This qualitative synthesis of 34 studies identified several factors that influence uptake and compliance with the Surgical Safety Checklist, including effective leadership and use of audit and feedback.

Structural racism continues to perpetuate health disparities. As part of their study on how black patients with serious illness experience racism from providers, researchers conducted interviews with 21 providers to understand ways they address anti-Black racism in their practice. Providers felt unprepared to address racism with their patients, wanted to provide tools for patients to bring up their experiences while also acknowledging the additional burden this would place on Black patients, and thought patient- and provider-facing programs could facilitate discussions. Additionally, despite extensive research on the negative impacts of structural racism on health, participants cited the need for more data.

Hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a significant source of preventable patient harm. This study of 4,252 high-risk general surgery patients found that only one-third received care in compliance with VTE prophylaxis guidelines. Patients receiving guideline-compliant care experienced shorter lengths of stay (LOS), fewer blood transfusions, and decreased odds of having a VTE, emphasizing the importance of initiating VTE chemoprophylaxis in high-risk general surgery patients.

Staff engagement in safety and quality improvement efforts fosters a culture of safety and can reduce medical errors. This survey of 52 obstetrics and gynecology departments at academic medical centers found that few departments provided faculty with protected time or financial support for quality improvement activities, and only 5% of departments included a patient representative on the quality committee.

Feedback interventions (e.g., debriefing, peer-to-peer, audit, and feedback) can encourage learning from safety events and improve quality of care. This systematic review of 48 studies found that providing feedback to emergency medical services (EMS) personnel can improve documentation and adherence to protocols, with some studies also documenting improvements in clinical decision-making and cardiac arrest performance.

The Enhancing Quality of Prescribing Practices for Older Adults in the Emergency Department (EQUIIPPED) program is a multicomponent intervention intended to reduce potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) prescribing among older adults who are discharged from the emergency department (ED). This cluster-randomized trial set at eight Veterans Health Administration (VA) EDs compared the impact of two approaches to the audit and feedback component of the intervention – active provider feedback using academic detailing (i.e., educational outreach visits to improve clinical decision making) versus passive provider feedback using dashboard based on the Beers criteria. Researchers found that academic detailing significantly improved PIM prescribing compared to sites using the dashboard, but noted that dashboard-based audit and feedback may be a reasonable strategy EDs with limited resources.

Pediatric patients are at particularly high risk for medication errors. This article describes the STAMP initiative (Safe Treatment and Administration of Medicine in Pediatrics) which aims to reduce pediatric inpatient prescribing and administration errors. The authors summarize the STAMP interventions originally implemented in 2017 and discuss the new interventions implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic (between July 2020 and August 2021), which led to sustained reductions in prescribing errors.

Debriefing after clinical events is an important opportunity for critical learning, process improvement, and enhancing team communication. This systematic review of 21 studies synthesized findings regarding the attributes and evidence supporting the use of clinical debriefing tools. While all of the evaluated tools included points related to education and evaluation, few tools included a process for implementing change or addressed staff emotions. The authors include recommendations for clinicians, educators and researchers for teaching, implementing and evaluating clinical debriefing tools.

Peer feedback is an emerging approach to improving clinicians’ diagnostic reasoning skills. The authors outline several barriers to diagnostic performance feedback and propose solutions to improve diagnostic performance.

Research has shown that prescribers who are notified of a patient’s fatal opioid overdose will decrease milligram morphine equivalents (MME) up to 3 months following notification as compared to prescribers who are not notified. This article reports on the same cohort’s prescribing behavior at 4-12 months. Among prescribers who received notification, total weekly MME continued to decrease more than the control group during the 4-12 month period.