The PSNet Collection: All Content

The AHRQ PSNet Collection comprises an extensive selection of resources relevant to the patient safety community. These resources come in a variety of formats, including literature, research, tools, and Web sites. Resources are identified using the National Library of Medicine’s Medline database, various news and content aggregators, and the expertise of the AHRQ PSNet editorial and technical teams.

Search All Content

Clear all filter(s)

Displaying 1 - 20 of 288 Results

2022 John M. Eisenberg Patient Safety and Quality Awards.

Save to Library

Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2023;49(9):435-450.

The legacy of AHRQ leader John Eisenberg, MD, still inspires safety improvement work decades after his passing. This special issue highlights the efforts of the 2022 Eisenberg Award honorees and their impact on improving patient safety and quality. The 2022 award recipients coved here include Jason S. Adelman, MD, MS, and North American Partners in Anesthesia (NAPA).

Automated search methods for identifying wrong patient order entry-a scoping review.

Save to Library

Garrod M, Fox A, Rutter P. JAMIA Open. 2023;6:ooad057.

Understanding causes of wrong-patient order entry (WPOE) can help develop interventions to reduce those medication errors. This review summarizes how organizations and providers identify WPOE, what data are being captured, and causes. The most common organizational detection method is the retract-and-reorder method whereby a medication order is cancelled then reordered on a different patient within a specified period of time. There was minimal data on how providers detect their own WPOE errors. Technology and physician workload were identified as contributors to WPOE.

Identifying a list of healthcare 'never events' to effect system change: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Save to Library

Bowman CL, De Gorter R, Zaslow J, et al. BMJ Open Qual. 2023;12:e002264.

Never events are catastrophic adverse events resulting in patient death or significant disability that are largely preventable. This narrative synthesis describes which events organizations most frequently identify as never events, and which are most commonly described as entirely preventable. 125 unique never events were identified, nearly 20% of which were classified as entirely preventable. The most frequent never events were wrong site or wrong patient surgery, wrong surgical procedure, and unintentionally retained objects.

Factors contributing to preventing operating room "never events": a machine learning analysis.

Save to Library

Arad D, Rosenfeld A, Magnezi R. Patient Saf Surg. 2023;17:6.

Surgical never events are rare but devastating for patients. Using machine learning, this study identified 24 contributing factors to two types of surgical never events - wrong site surgery and retained items. Communication, the number and type of staff present, and the type and length of surgery were identified contributing factors.

Patient Safety Authority Annual Reports.

Save to Library

Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority. Harrisburg, PA: Patient Safety Authority; April 2023.

This report summarizes patient safety improvement work in the state of Pennsylvania. It reviews the 2022 activities of the Patient Safety Authority that reflected a strategic emphasis on reporting compliance and data quality. Additional sections cover educational, publication, and learning management system efforts.

ISMP Targeted Medication Safety Best Practices for Community Pharmacy.

Save to Library

Horsham, PA; Institute for Safe Medication Practices: April 2023.

Community pharmacies are common providers of medication delivery that harbor process weaknesses affecting safety. This guidance shares evidence-based steps to address problems such as wrong patient errors and lack of consistent barcode system use in the community setting.

Creating a stronger culture of safety within US community pharmacies.

Save to Library

Lewis NJW, Marwitz KK, Gaither CA, et al. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2023;49:280-284.

Community pharmacies face unique challenges in ensuring patient safety. This commentary summarizes research on prescribing errors in community pharmacies and how a culture of safety in community pharmacies can drive improvements in prescribing safety.

Evaluating patient identification practices during intrahospital transfers: a human factors approach.

Save to Library

Suclupe S, Kitchin J, Sivalingam R, et al. J Patient Saf. 2023;19:117-127.

Patient identification mistakes can have serious consequences. Using the Systems Engineering for Patient Safety (SEIPS) framework, this qualitative study explored systems factors contributing to patient identification errors during intrahospital transfers. The authors found that patient identification was not completed according to hospital policy during any of the 60 observed patient transfer handoffs. Miscommunication and lack of key patient information were common factors contributing to identification errors.

Access to Clinical Information at the Bedside.

Save to Library

Farnborough, UK: Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch; February 2023.

Patient misidentification in emergent situations can reduce the appropriateness of care delivery and safety. This report analyzes an incident where the healthcare team misidentified a patient (who had a do-not-resuscitate order) and withheld cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) from the wrong patient. The lack of access to health information technology at the bedside, and reference to the patient’s wristband, were factors contributing to the patient’s death.

Insurance claims for wrong-side, wrong-organ, wrong-procedure, or wrong-person surgical errors: a retrospective study for 10 years.

Save to Library

Vacheron C-H, Acker A, Autran M, et al. J Patient Saf. 2023;19:e13-e17.

Wrong-site, wrong-procedure, and wrong-patient errors (WSPEs) are serious adverse events. This retrospective analysis of medical liability claims data examined the incidence of WSPEs in France between 2007 and 2017. During this ten-year period, WSPEs accounted for 0.4% of all claims. Procedures on the wrong organ were most common (44%), followed by wrong side (39%), wrong person (13%) and wrong procedure (4%). The researchers found that the average number of WSPEs decreased after implementation of a surgical checklist.

Assessment of the use of patient vital sign data for preventing misidentification and medical errors.

Save to Library

Maul J, Straub J. Healthcare (Basel). 2022;10:2440.

Patient misidentification can lead to serious medical errors and patient harm. This article provides an overview of how artificial intelligence (AI) frameworks can be combined with patient vital sign data to prevent patient misidentification. The authors suggest that this system could provide alerts indicating possible misidentification or it could be paired with other indicator systems as part of a multi-factor misidentification system.

Resilient Healthcare and the Safety-I and Safety-II Frameworks

Save to Library

Perspective on Safety December 14, 2022

This piece discusses resilient healthcare and the Safety-I and Safety-II approaches to patient safety.

In conversation with Ellen Deutsch, MD, MS, FACS, FAAP, FSSH, CPPS

Ellen Deutsch, MD, MS, FACS, FAAP, FSSH, CPPS is a Medical Officer in the Center for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Dr. Deutsch is a pediatric otolaryngologist and has vast experience in simulation and resilience engineering. We spoke with her about resilient healthcare and how resilient engineering principles are applied to improve patient safety.

A longitudinal evaluation of computed tomography radiation incidents within a multisite NHS trust.

Save to Library

Adamson HK, Foster B, Clarke R, et al. J Patient Saf. 2022;18:e1096-e1101.

Computed tomography (CT) scans are important diagnostic tools but can present serious dangers from overexposure to radiation. Researchers reviewed 133 radiation incidents reported to one NHS trust from 2015-2018. Reported events included radiation incidents, near-miss incidents, and repeat scans. Most events were investigated using a systems approach, and staff were encouraged to report all types of incidents, including near misses, to foster a culture of safety and enable learning.

Serious hazards of transfusion: evaluating the dangers of a wrong patient autologous salvaged blood in cardiac surgery.

Save to Library

Uramatsu M, Maeda H, Mishima S, et al. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022;17:182.

Wrong-patient transfusion errors can lead to serious patient harm. This case report describes a blood transfusion error and summarizes the systems issues that emerged during the root case analysis, as well as the corrective steps implemented by the hospital to prevent future transfusion errors. A previous Spotlight Case featured a near-miss transfusion error and strategies for ensuring safe transfusion practices.

Adding automation and independent dual verification to reduce wrong blood in tube (WBIT) events.

Save to Library

Passwater M, Huggins YM, Delvo Favre ED, et al. Am J Clin Pathol. 2022;158:212-215.

Wrong blood in tube (WBIT) errors are rare but can lead to complications. One hospital implemented a quality improvement project to reduce WBIT errors with electronic patient identification, manual independent dual verification, and staff education. WBIT errors were significantly reduced and sustained over six years.

Strength of safety measures introduced by medical practices to prevent a recurrence of patient safety incidents: an observational study.

Save to Library

Müller BS, Lüttel D, Schütze D, et al. J Patient Saf. 2022;18:444-448.

Effective patient safety improvement efforts address safety threats at the individual, interpersonal, and organizational levels. This study characterizes safety measures described in incident reports from German outpatient care settings. Of the 243 preventative measures identified across 160 reports, 83% of preventative measures were classified by the research team as “weak,” meaning that they focus on influencing human behavior rather than on treating underlying problems (e.g., alerts, trainings, double checks).

High-reliability organisation principles implemented in dentistry.

Save to Library

Minyé HM, Benjamin EM. Br Dent J. 2022;232:879-885.

High reliability organization (HRO) principles used in other high-risk industries (such as aviation) can be applied patient safety. This article provides an overview of how HRO principles (preoccupation with failure, situational awareness, reluctance to simplify, deference to expertise, and commitment to resilience) can be successfully applied in dentistry.

Machine learning models outperform manual result review for the identification of wrong blood in tube errors in complete blood count results.

Save to Library

Farrell C‐JL, Giannoutsos J. Int J Lab Hematol. 2022;44:497-503.

Wrong blood in tube (WBIT) errors can result in serious diagnostic and treatment errors, but may go unrecognized by clinical staff. In this study, machine learning was used to identify potential WBIT errors which were then compared to manual review by laboratory staff. The machine learning models showed higher accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity compared to manual review.

Check Twice, Transport Once

Save to Library

WebM&M Case May 16, 2022

This WebM&M describes two incidences of the incorrect patient being transported from the Emergency Department (ED) to other parts of the hospital for tests or procedures. In one case, the wrong patient was identified before undergoing an unnecessary procedure; in the second case, the wrong patient received an unnecessary chest x-ray. The commentary highlights the consequences of patient transport errors and strategies to enhance the safety of patient transport and prevent transport-related errors.

The Media’s Role in Patient Safety

Save to Library

Perspective on Safety April 27, 2022

This piece discusses the role that media plays in affecting patient safety.

In Conversation With... Michael L. Millenson

Michael L. Millenson is the President of Health Quality Advisors LLC, author of the critically acclaimed book Demanding Medical Excellence: Doctors and Accountability in the Information Age, and an adjunct associate professor of medicine at Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine. He serves on the Board of Directors for Project Patient Care, and earlier in his career he was a healthcare reporter for the Chicago Tribune, where he was nominated three times for a Pulitzer Prize. We spoke with him about how patient safety efforts are shaped by the media and how the role of media has changed since our original discussion on the role of media in patient safety (published in October of 2009 (https://psnet.ahrq.gov/perspective/conversation-charles-ornstein; https://psnet.ahrq.gov/perspective/media-essential-if-sometimes-arbitrary-promoter-patient-safety)).

The PSNet Collection: All Content

Search All Content

Connect With Us

Sign up for Email Updates

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

The PSNet Collection: All Content

Search All Content

Connect With Us

Sign up for Email Updates

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

PSNet Log in

Submit Your Innovations

Continue as a Guest

Continue Logged In

Submit Your Innovations

Continue as a Guest

Continue logged in

New Users to the PSNet site